Social Comparisons to Motivate Contributions to an Online Community

  • F. Maxwell Harper
  • Sherry Xin Li
  • Yan Chen
  • Joseph A. Konstan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4744)


It is increasingly common for online communities to rely on members rather than editors to contribute and moderate content. To motivate members to perform these tasks, some sites display social comparisons, information designed to show members how they compare to others in the system. For example, Amazon, an online book store, shows a list of top reviewers. In this study, we investigate the effect of email newsletters that tell members of an online community that their contributions are above, below, or about average. We find that these comparisons focus members’ energy on the system features we highlight, but do not increase overall interest in the site. We also find that men and women perceive the comparisons very differently.


Social influence social comparison persuasion online community 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R.: Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities. CSCW (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernheim, D.: A Theory of Conformity. The Journal of Political Economy 102(5) (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buunk, B., Collins, R., Taylor, S., VanYperen, N., Dakof, G.: The Affective Consequences Of Social Comparison: Either Direction Has Its Ups And Downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(6) (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng, R., Vassileva, J.: User Motivation and Persuasion Strategy for Peer-to-Peer Communities. HICSS (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Croson, R., Shang, J.: Field Experiments in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Influence on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods. Knowledge@Wharton (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison. Human Relations 7 (1954)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frey, B., Meier, S.: Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior - Testing Conditional Cooperation in a Field Experiment. American Economic Review 94(5) (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grossman, L.: Time’s Person of the Year: You. Time Magazine (December 25, 2006),
  9. 9.
    Harper, F., Li, X., Chen, Y., Konstan, J.: An Economic Model of User Rating in an Online Recommender System. User Modeling (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kluger, A., Denisi, A.: The Effects Of Feedback Interventions On Performance: A Historical Review, A Meta-Analysis, And A Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin 119(2) (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ledyard, J.: Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In: The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lockwood, P., Kunda, Z.: Superstars And Me: Predicting The Impact Of Role Models On The Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(1) (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabin, M.: Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review 83(5) (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Sushak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: Grouplens: An Open Architecture For Collaborative Filtering Of Netnews. CSCW (1994) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schultz, P.: Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 21(1) (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suls, J., Martin, R., Wheeler, L.: Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wheeler, L., Miyake, K.: Social Comparison In Everyday Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(5) (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Maxwell Harper
    • 1
  • Sherry Xin Li
    • 2
  • Yan Chen
    • 3
  • Joseph A. Konstan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 
  2. 2.University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083 
  3. 3.University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 

Personalised recommendations