Building the Presentation-Tier of Rich Web Applications with Hierarchical Components
Nowadays information systems are increasingly distributed and deployed within the Internet platform. Without any doubt, the World Wide Web represents the de facto standard platform for hosting such distributed systems. The use of a multi-tiered architecture to develop such systems is often the best design decision to reach scalability, maintainability and reliability quality goals. Software in the presentation-tier of this architecture needs in practice to be designed with structured and reusable library modules. In this paper, we present a hierarchical component model which allows developers to build (model, generate code and then reuse) this software level of rich Web applications. In this model, components can be connected via their interfaces to build more complex components. These architecture design models can be reused together with their corresponding code using an association mechanism. As shown in this paper this is a valuable feature in assisting developers to position their developed documents within the overall software design and thus enable maintaining the consistency between artifacts of these two stages of the development process.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Alliance, O.A.: Open ajax alliance web site (Last access: February 2007), http://www.openajax.org/
- 2.Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures, Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
- 3.Conallen, J.: Modeling Web Applications with UML, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Eclipse. Eclipse web site (Last access: June 2007), http://www.eclipse.org/
- 5.Ginige, J.A., De Silva, B., Ginige, A.: Towards end user development of web applications for smes: A component based approach. In: Lowe, D.G., Gaedke, M. (eds.) ICWE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3579, pp. 489–499. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Hennicker, R., Koch, N.: Systematic design of web applications with uml. In: Unified Modeling Language: Systems Analysis, Design and Development Issues, pp. 1–20. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Kandé, M.M., Strohmeier, A.: Towards a uml profile for software architecture descriptions. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) UML 2000. LNCS, vol. 1939, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Larsson, M.: Predicting Quality Attributes in Component-based Software Systems. PhD thesis, Mälardalen University, Sweden (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.OMG. Meta object facility (mof) 2.0 core specification, document ptc/04-10-15 (2004), Object Management Group Web Site: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?ptc/04-10-15.pdf
- 12.OMG. Object constraint language specification, version 2.0, document formal/2006-05-01(2006), Object Management Group Web Site: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?formal/06-05-01.pdf
- 13.Tibermacine, C., Fleurquin, R., Sadou, S.: Preserving architectural choices throughout the component-based software development process. In: WICSA 2005. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture, November 2005, pp. 121–130. IEEE Computer Society Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Tibermacine, C., Fleurquin, R., Sadou, S.: On-demand quality-oriented assistance in component-based software evolution. In: Gorton, I., Heineman, G.T., Crnkovic, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4063, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar