An Evaluation of Triple-Store Technologies for Large Data Stores
This paper presents a comparison of performance of various triple-store technologies currently in either production release or beta test. Our comparison of triple-store technologies is biased toward a deployment scenario where the triple-store needs to load data and respond to queries over a very large knowledge base (on the order of hundreds of millions of triples.) The comparisons in this paper are based on the Lehigh University Benchmark (LUBM) software tools. We used the LUBM university ontology, datasets, and standard queries to perform our comparisons. We find that over our test regimen, the triple-stores based on the DAML DB and BigOWLIM technologies exhibit the best performance among the triple-stores tested.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: An evaluation of knowledge base systems for large OWL datasets. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
- 2.Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems. Journal of Web Semantics 3(2), 158–182 (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Lee, R.: Scalability report on triple store applications. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (July 2004), http://simile.mit.edu/reports/stores/
- 4.Beckett, D.: SWAD-Europe deliverable 10.1: Scalability and storage: Survey of free software / open source RDF storage systems. Technical Report IST-2001-34732, EU (July 2002), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/rdf_scalable_storage_report