Abstract

Capturing the interaction behavior between two or more business parties has major importance in the context of business-to-business (B2B) process integration. The Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), being the de-facto standard for modeling intra-organizational processes, also includes capabilities for describing cross-organizational collaboration. However, as this paper will show, BPMN fails to capture advanced choreography scenarios. Therefore, this paper proposes extensions to broaden the applicability of BPMN. The proposal is validated using the Service Interaction Patterns.

Keywords

Incoming Message Winning Bidder Reference Passing Service Choreography Contingent Request 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burbeck, S.: The Tao of E-Business Services (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fallside, D.C., Walmsley, P.: Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Technical report (2005), http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/
  3. 3.
    Zaha, J.M., Barros, A., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: A Language for Service Behavior Modeling. In: CoopIS 2006. Proceedings 14th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Montpellier, France, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kavantzas, N., Burdett, D., Ritzinger, G., Lafon, Y.: Web Services Choreography Description Language Version 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation. Technical report (2005), http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-cdl-10
  5. 5.
    OMG.org: Business Process Modeling Notation. 1.0 edn. (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barros, A., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.: Service Interaction Patterns. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 302–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Decker, G., Overdick, H., Zaha, J.M.: On the Suitability of WS-CDL for Choreography Modeling. In: EMISA 2006. Proceedings of Methoden, Konzepte und Technologien für die Entwicklung von dienstebasierten Informationssystemen, Hamburg, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Object Management Group (OMG): UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Decker, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Weske, M.: BPEL4chor: Extending BPEL for Modeling Choreographies. In: Proceedings International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barros, A., Decker, G., Dumas, M., Weber, F.: Correlation Patterns in Service-Oriented Architectures. In: FASE. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, Braga, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaha, J.M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Barros, A., Decker, G.: Service Interaction Modeling: Bridging Global and Local Views. In: EDOC 2006. Proceedings 10th IEEE International EDOC Conference, Hong Kong, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Decker, G., Weske, M.: Local Enforceability in Interaction Petri Nets. In: BPM 2007. Proceedings 5th International Conference on Business Process Management, Brisbane, Australia. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seel, C., Vanderhaeghen, D.: Meta-model based extensions of the epc for inter-organisational process modelling. In: Proceedings 4th GI-Workshop EPK 2005 - Geschäftsprozessmanagement (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Formal semantics and automated analysis of BPMN process models. Preprint 7115, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong, P.Y., Gibbons, J.: A process semantics for BPMN. Technical report, Oxford University Computing Laboratory (2007), http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/peter.wong/pub/bpmnsem.pdf
  18. 18.
    Wong, P.Y., Gibbons, J.: Verifying business process compatibility. In: MTCoord 2007. Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Methods and Tools for Coordinating Concurrent, Distributed and Mobile Systems, Paphos, Cyprus (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martens, A.: Analyzing Web Service based Business Processes. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puhlmann, F., Weske, M.: Interaction Soundness for Service Orchestrations. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 302–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Massuthe, P., Reisig, W., Schmidt, K.: An Operating Guideline Approach to the SOA. Annals of Mathematics, Computing & Teleinformatics 1, 35–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dijkman, R., Dumas, M.: Service-oriented Design: A Multi-viewpoint Approach. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13, 337–368 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Decker, G., Puhlmann, F., Weske, M.: Formalizing Service Interactions. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 414–419. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosa-Velardo, F., de Frutos-Escrig, D.: Name creation vs. replication in petri net systems. In: Petri Nets 2007. Proceedings 28th International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets and other Models of Concurrency, Siedlce, Poland (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gero Decker
    • 1
  • Frank Puhlmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Business Process Technology Group, Hasso Plattner Institut for IT Systems Engineering, University of Potsdam, D-14482 PotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations