Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation with Header Compression for IP Based Satellite Communication over DVB-S

  • Chee-Hong Teh
  • Tat-Chee Wan
  • Rahmat Budiarto
  • Way-Chuang Ang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4866)

Abstract

The Multi-Protocol Encapsulation (MPE) is a standard method for encapsulating IP packets into MPEG-2 TS frames. However MPE has some disadvantages in simplicity and efficiency to support next generation network. The Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) is a new solution to overcome limitations of MPE. In ULE, packets are layered directly into the payload field of MPEG-2 TS frames. This is a new encapsulation method for the transport of IPv4 and other network protocol packets directly over MPEG-2 TS. In this paper, we describe the principles and the benefits of ULE and we also proposed Robust Header Compression Scheme to work with ULE in order to enhance the performance of existing ULE. This paper also provides a simulation analysis to show that the new proposed method can offer a better performance in delay, throughput and overhead especially when the packet size is small.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fairhurst, G., et al.: Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) for Transmission of IP Datagrams over an MPEG-2 Transport Stream (TS). RFC 4326. IETF (2005), Available from World Wide Web: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4326.txt?number=4326 (Accessed 23th Feb. 2006)
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC, 13818-1: 2005. Information Technology - Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information. Part 1: Systems. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, Switzerland (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EBU & ETSI: EN 300 421 v1.1.2.: Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Framing structure, channel coding and modulation for 11/12 GHz satellite services. European Broadcasting Union & European Telecommunication Standards Institutes, France (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deering, S.: Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification. RFC 2460. IETF (1998) , Available from World Wide Web: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0768.txt?number=2460 (Accessed 12th October 2006)
  5. 5.
    Bormann, C., et al.: RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and four profiles: RTP, UDP, ESP, and uncompressed. RFC 3095. IETF (2001), Available from World Wide Web: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3095.txt?number=3095 (Accessed 1st March 2006)
  6. 6.
    Matyasovszki, I., et al.: Packet Level Symbiosis. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Poster/Demo Session (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Packet Size Distributions (2004), Available from World Wide Web: http://ipmon.sprint.com/packstat/viewresult.php?0:pktsz:sj-20.0-040206 (Accessed 3rd March 2006)
  8. 8.
    Fraleigh, C., et al.: Packet-Level Traffic Measurements from the Sprint IP Backbone. IEEE Network 17(6), 6–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson, K., et al.: Wide-Area Internet Traffic Patterns and Characteristics. IEEE Network 11(6), 10–23 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitzek, F., et al.: Header Compression Schemes for Wireless Internet Access. In: Wireless Internet: Technologies and Applications, pp. 10.1–10.24. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fall, K., Varadhan, K.: The ns Manual (2006), Available from World Wide Web: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-documentation.html (Accessed 22th July 2005)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chee-Hong Teh
    • 1
  • Tat-Chee Wan
    • 1
  • Rahmat Budiarto
    • 1
  • Way-Chuang Ang
    • 1
  1. 1.Network Research Group, School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden, PenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations