Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on a Suitable Combination of Deformable Models and Artificial Neural Networks Techniques

  • Yosvany López
  • Andra Novoa
  • Miguel A. Guevara
  • Augusto Silva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4756)

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) breast cancer is the most common cancer suffered by women in the world, which during the last two decades has increased the women mortality in developing countries. Mammography is the best method used for screening; it is a test producing no inconvenience and with small diagnostic doubts of breast cancer since the preclinical phase. For this reason, unfailing Computer-Aided Diagnosis systems for automated detection/classification of abnormalities are very useful and helpful to medical personnel. In this work is proposed a novel method that combines deformable models and Artificial Neural Networks among others techniques to diagnose diverse mammography abnormalities (calcifications, well-defined / circumscribed masses, spiculated masses, ill-defined masses, architectural distortions and asymmetries) as benign or malignant. The proposed algorithm was validated on the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MiniMIAS) database in a dataset formed by 100 mammography images, which were selected randomly.

Keywords

Breast cancer mammography images deformable models artificial neural networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Nishikawa, S.R., Papaioannou, J., Onsis, R., Haldemann Heusler, R.A., Giger, M.L., et al.: Performance of a prototype clinical intelligent mammography workstation. In: Digital mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roehrig, J.D.T., Hasegawa, A., Hunt, B., Marshall, J., Romsdahl, H., et al.: Clinical results with R2 ImageChecker system. In: Digital mammography, Kluwer academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shih-Chung, B.L.H.L., Wang, Y., Kinnard, L., Freedman, M.T.: Multiple Circular Path Convolution Neural Network System for Detection of Mammographic Masses. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging 150–158 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Sepehr M.H.Jamarani, B.G.R.-r., Behnam, C.H.: A Novel Method for Breast Cancer Prognosis Using Wavelet Packet Based Neural Network. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, Shanghai, China (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Segyeong Joo, Y.S.Y., Moon, W.K., Kim, H.C.: Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Solid Breast Nodules: Use of an Artificial Neural Network Based on Multiple Sonographic Features. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging 1292–1300 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paul Sajda, C.S., Pearson, J.: Learning Contextual Relationships in Mammograms Using a Hierarchical Pyramid Neural Network. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging 239–250 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ping Zhang, B.V., Kumar, K.: Neural vs. statistical classifier in conjunction with genetic algorithm based feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters 1–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lúcio, F.A., Campos, A.C.S., Barros, A.K.: Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Digital Mammograms Using Independent Component Analysis and Neural Networks. In: Sanfeliu, A., Cortés, M.L. (eds.) CIARP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3773, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Artur Chodorowski, U.M., Langille, M., Hamarneh, G.: Color Lesion Boundary Detection Using Live Wire. Medical Imaging (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jianming Liang, T.M., Terzopoulos, D.: United Snakes. Medical Image Analysis p. 215–233 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghassan Hamarneh, J.H.: DTMRI: Segmentation using DT-Snakes and DT-Livewire. In: IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelvin Poon, G.H.: Rafeef Abugharbieh, Segmentation of Complex Objects with Non-Spherical Topologies from Volumetric Medical Images using 3D Livewire (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karsten Rodenacker, E.B.: A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Analytical Cellular Pathology 1–36 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinton, G.E., William, D.E.R.R.J.: Learning internal representation by back-propagation errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Widrow, B.: M.E.H. Adaptive switching circuits. in IRE WESCON Convention Record, New York IRE (1960)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohonen, T. (ed.): Self-Organization and Associative Memory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yosvany López
    • 1
  • Andra Novoa
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Guevara
    • 1
  • Augusto Silva
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Computer Sciences Technologies, Ciego de Ávila UniversityCuba
  2. 2.IEETA, Aveiro UniversityPortugal

Personalised recommendations