Gödel, Escher, Bach and Super-expertise
A major problem in knowledge acquisition is expert combinatorics. A human expert, such as a lawyer, deals with combinatorics restricted to the client’s case in hand; only part of the full combinatorics is worked out. An artificial expert, with computational intelligence, processes all possible user cases consistently; it has Super-expertise that can process any case much quicker and more expediently than a human expert. This paper considers the nature and limits of Super-expertise, with some reference to the early visions of artificial intelligence of Hofstadter, in order to develop programming epistemology as methodology that may solve many of the knowledge acquisition problems that have produced the Feigenbaum bottleneck. An application of a fifth generation language, a Superexpert system shell called eGanges, which was designed according to a computational epistemology of a legal expert, is used to illustrate this development of programming epistemology.
KeywordsCombinatorics eGanges Epistemology Expert Systems Super-expertise
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hofstadter, D.R.: Gödel, Escher, Bach. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England (1979)Google Scholar
- 2.Gray, P.N.: Legal Knowledge Engineering Methodology for Large Scale Expert Systems, PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Quinlan, J.R.: Discovering rules by induction from large collections of examples. In: Mitchie, D.E. (ed.) Expert systems in the micro-electronic age, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland (1979)Google Scholar
- 5.Gray, P.N.: Artificial legal intelligence. Dartmouth Publishing Co., Aldershot (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Compton, P., Jansen, R.: Knowledge in context: a strategy for expert system maintenance. In: AI 1988: Proceedings of the second Australian Conference in Artificial Intelligence, Adelaide, pp. 283–297 (1988)Google Scholar