Stress Echocardiography pp 487-497 | Cite as
Stress Echocardiography After Cardiac Transplantation
Stress echocardiography in cardiac transplantation has three main potential applications: the detection of acute rejection in the first year after cardiac transplantation; the detection of chronic rejection later after cardiac transplantation; and – last but not least – the recruitment of marginal donor hearts as a way to solve the current donor heart shortage. The three applications have a different clinical role today. Despite the ongoing efforts of old and innovative resting and stress echocardiographic techniques in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection, endomyocardial biopsies are still regarded as the gold standard for the detection of acute allograft rejection, which is often associated with an acute reduction in coronary flow reserve of potential diagnostic value. Conversely, stress echocardiography is able to identify accurately cardiac graft vasculopathy and has a recognized prognostic value in this clinical setting, where a normal stress echocardiogram by wall motion criteria justifies avoiding or delaying invasive studies. In the setting of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, the integration of coronary flow reserve to transthoracic stress echocardiography might further improve the value of the method. Finally, it is still purely investigational – albeit promising – to use bedside stress echocardiography for the appropriate selection of marginal heart donors with brain death to solve the current shortage of donor heart supply.
Keywords
Acute Rejection Coronary Flow Reserve Cardiac Transplantation Stress Echocardiography Dobutamine Stress EchocardiographyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Hunt SA, Haddad F (2008) The changing face of heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:587–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Nitemberg A, Tavolaro O, Loisance D, et al (1989) Severe impairment of coronary reserve during rejection in patients with orthotopic heart transplant. Circulation 79:59–65Google Scholar
- 3.Picano E, Pálinkás A, Amyot R (2001) Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 19:1177–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Camici PG, Crea F (2007) Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356:830–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al (1992) Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimal thickening. Circulation 85:979–987PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Klauss V, Mudra H, Uberfuhr P, et al (1995) Intraindividual variability of cardiac allograft vasculopathy as assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 76:463–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pflugfelder P W, Boughner DR, Rudas L, et al (1993) Enhanced detection of cardiac allograft arterial disease with intracoronary ultrasonographic imaging. Am Heart J 125:1583–1591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kofoed K F, Czernin J, Johnson J, Kobashigawa J, Phelps ME, Laks H, Schelbert HR (1997) Effects of cardiac allograft vasculopathy on myocardial blood flow, vasodilatory capacity, and coronary vasomotion. Circulation 95:600–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Muehling OM, Wilke NM, Panse P, Jerosch-Herold M, Wilson B V, Wilson R F, Miller LW (2003) Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve and transmural perfusion gradient in heart transplant ar-teriopathy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1054–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fearon WF, Nakamura M, Lee DP, Rezaee M, Vagelos RH, Hunt SA, Fitzgerald PJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC (2003) Simultaneous assessment of fractional and coronary flow reserves in cardiac transplant recipients: Physiologic Investigation for Transplant Arteriopathy (PITA Study). Circulation 108:1605–1610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Weis M, Hartmann A, Olbrich HG, Hör G, Zeiher AM (1998) Prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve on left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation 65:103–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rodrigues AC, Frimm Cde C, Bacal F, Andreolli V, Tsutsui JM, Bocchi EA, Mathias W Jr, Lage SG (2005) Coronary flow reserve impairment predicts cardiac events in heart transplant patients with preserved left ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 103:201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Smart F W, Ballantyne CM, Cocanougher B, et al (1991) Insensitivity of noninvasive tests to detect coronary artery vasculopathy after heart transplant. Am J Cardiol 67:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mairesse GH, Marwick TH, Melin JA, et al (1995) Use of exercise electrocardiography, tech-netium-99m-MIBI perfusion tomography, and two-dimensional echocardiography for coronary disease surveillance in a low-prevalence population of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 14:222–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cohn JM,Wilensky RL, O'Donnell JA, et al (1996) Exercise echocardiography, angiography, and intracoronary ultrasound after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 77:1216–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Collings CA, Pinto FJ, Valantine HA, et al (1994) Exercise echocardiography in heart transplant recipients: a comparison with angiography and intracoronary ultrasonography. J Heart Lung Transplant 13:604–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ciliberto GR, Mangiavacchi M, Banfi F, et al (1993) Coronary artery disease after heart transplantation: non-invasive evaluation with exercise thallium scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 14:226–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mondillo S, Maccherini M, Galderisi M (2008) Usefulness and limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in heart transplantation recipients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ciliberto GR, Mascarello M, Gronda E, et al (1994) Acute rejection after heart transplantation: noninvasive echocardiographic evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:1156–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ciliberto GR, Pingitore A, Mangiavacchi M, et al (1996) The clinical value of blunting of cyclic gray level variation for the detection of acute cardiac rejection: a two-dimensional, Doppler, and videodensitometric ultrasound study. J Am Soc Echoc 27:142–148Google Scholar
- 21.Angermann CE, Nassau K, Stempfle HU, et al (1997) Recognition of acute cardiac allograft rejection from serial integrated backscatter analyses in human orthotopic heart transplant recipients. Comparison with conventional echocardiography. Circulation 95:140–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Picano E, De Pieri G, Salerno JA, et al (1990) Electrocardiographic changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia elicited by dipyridamole infusion in acute rejection early after heart transplantation. Circulation 81:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tona F, Caforio AL, Montisci R, Angelini A, Ruscazio M, Gambino A, Ramondo A, Thiene G, Gerosa G, Iliceto S (2006) Coronary flow reserve by contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a new noninvasive diagnostic tool for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant 6(5 Pt 1):998–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ciliberto GR, Massa D, Mangiavacchi M, et al (1993) High-dose dipyridamole echocardiog-raphy test in coronary artery disease after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J 14:48–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ciliberto GR, Parodi O, Cataldo G, Mangiavacchi M, Alberti A, Parolini M, Frigerio M (2003) Prognostic value of contractile response during high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 22:526–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Akosah KO, Mohanty PK, Funai JT, et al (1994) Noninvasive detection of transplant coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 13:1024–1038PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Derumeaux G, Redonnet M, Mouton-Schleifer D, et al (1995) Dobutamine stress echocar-diography in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. VACOMED Research Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1665–1672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Spes CH, Klauss V, Rieber J, et al (1999) Functional and morphological findings in heart transplant recipients with a normal coronary angiogram: an analysis by dobutamine stress echocardiography, intracoronary Doppler and intravascular ultrasound. J Heart Lung Transplant 18:391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Spes CH, Klauss V, Mudra H, et al (1999) Diagnostic and prognostic value of serial do-butamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment of cardiac allograft vascu-lopathy: a comparison with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 100:509–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Akosah KO, McDaniel S, Hanrahan JS, et al (1998) Dobutamine stress echocardiography early after heart transplantation predicts development of allograft coronary artery disease and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1607–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Lewis JF, Selman SB, Murphy JD, et al (1997) Dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of ischemic events in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 16:390–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Derumeaux G, Redonnet M, Soyer R, et al (1998) Assessment of the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 17:259–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Bacal F, Moreira L, Souza G, Rodrigues AC, Fiorelli A, Stolf N, Bocchi E, Bellotti G, Ramires JA (2004) Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts cardiac events or death in asymptomatic patients long-term after heart transplantation: 4-year prospective evaluation. J Heart Lung Transplant 23:1238–1244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Larsen RL, Applegate PM, Dyar DA, et al (1998) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessing coronary artery disease after transplantation in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:515–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pahl E, Crawford SE, Swenson JM, et al (1999) Dobutamine stress echocardiography: experience in pediatric heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 18:725–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Tona F, Caforio AL, Montisci R, Gambino A, Angelini A, Ruscazio M, Toscano G, Feltrin G, Ramondo A, Gerosa G, Iliceto S (2006) Coronary flow velocity pattern and coronary flow reserve by contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography predict long-term outcome in heart transplantation. Circulation 114:I49–I55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Zaroff JG, Rosengard BR, Armstrong WF, Babcock WD, D'Alessandro A, Dec GW, Edwards NM, Higgins RS, Jeevanandum V, Kauffman M, Kirklin JK, Large SR, Marelli D, Peterson TS, Ring WS, Robbins RC, Russell SD, Taylor DO, Van Bakel A, Wallwork J, Young JB (2002) Consensus conference report: maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor: cardiac recommendations, March 28–29, 2001, Crystal City, Va. Circulation 106:836–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Arpesella G, Gherardi S, Bombardini T, Picano E (2006) Recruitment of aged donor heart with pharmacological stress echo. A case report. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 4:3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Bombardini T, Arpesella G, Gherardi S, Maccherini M, Serra W, Leone O, Tanganelli P, Pasanisi E, Picano E (2008) Extended donor criteria in heart transplantation with pharmacological stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2008 (abstract suppl)Google Scholar