Advertisement

Dynamic Linking of Web Resources: Customisation and Personalisation

  • Yeliz Yesilada
  • Sean Bechhofer
  • Bernard Horan
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 93)

Summary

Conceptual Open Hypermedia Service (COHSE) provides a framework that integrates a knowledge service and the open hypermedia link service to dynamically link Web documents via knowledge resources (e.g., ontologies or controlled vocabularies). The Web can be considered as a closed hypermedia system — Links on the Web are unidirectional, embedded, difficult to author and maintain. With a Semantic Web architecture COHSE addresses these limitations by dynamically creating, multi-headed links on third party documents by integrating third party knowledge resources and third party services. Therefore open-ness is a key aspect of COHSE. This chapter first presents how COHSE architecture is reengineered to support customisation and to create an adaptable open hypermedia system where the user explicitly provides information about himself. It then presents how this architecture is deployed in a portal and discusses how this portal architecture can be extended to turn COHSE from an adaptable system to an adaptive system where system implicitly infers some information about the user.

Keywords

Resource Service Knowledge Resource Dynamic Link Exploratory Search Knowledge Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.M. Anderson. Integrating open hypermedia systems with the world wide web. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Hypertext, pages 157–166. ACM, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.M. Apted. General purposive browsing. Library Association Record, 73(12): 228–230, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Atterer, M. Wnuk, and A. Schmidt. Knowing the user’s every move – user activity tracking for website usability evaluation and implicit interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Bates. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5):407–424, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bechhofer, R. Stevens, and P. Lord. Ontology driven dynamic linking of biology resources. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(3):155–163, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Brusilovsky. Adaptive navigation support: From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web and beyond. Psychnology, 2(1), 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Brusilovsky, C. Karagiannidis, and D. Sampson. Layered evaluation of adaptive learning systems. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong learning, 14(4/5), 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.D. Byrne, B.E. John, N.S. Wehrle, and D.C. Crow. The tangled web we wove: A taskonomy of www use. In CHI ’99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 544–551, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Carr, S. Kampa, W. Hall, S. Bechhofer, and C. Goble. Handbook on Ontologies, chapter COHSE: Conceptual Open Hypermedia Service, pages 193–209. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Chen, D. Hong, and V.Y. Shen. An experimental study on validation problems with existing html webpages. In Proceedings of International Conference on Internet Computing (ICOMP’05), pages 373–379, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.W. Choo, B. Detlor, and D. Turnbull. Information seeking on the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday (online), 5(2), 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.F. Cove and B.C. Walsh. Online text retrieval via browsing. Information Processing & Management, 24(1):31–37, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N.P. Dalal, Z. Quible, and K. Wyatt. Cognitive design of home pages: An experimental study of comprehension on the world wide web. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal, 36(4):607–621, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Davis. To embed or not to embed. Communications of the ACM, 38(8):108–109, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Dzbor, E. Motta, and J. Domingue. Opening up magpie via semantic web services. In Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference, volume 3298 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Ferguson, S. Schmoller, and N. Smith. Personalisation in presentation services. Technical report, The Joint Information Systems Committee, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Handschuh and S. Staab. Annotation for the Semantic Web, volume 96 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS, Amsterdam, 2003.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Heath, M. Dzbor, and E. Motta. Supporting user tasks and context: Challenges for semantic web research. In ESWC2005 Workshop on End-user Aspects of the Semantic Web (UserSWeb), Heraklion, Crete, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Herner. Browsing. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 3:408–415, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Jul and G.W. Furnas. Navigation in electronic worlds: A CHI 97 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(4):44–49, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Kahan and M. Koivunen. Annotea: An open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. In Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 623–632, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Kellar, C. Watters, and M. Shepherd. The impact of task on the usage of web browser navigation mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Graphics interface, pages 235–242, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2006. Canadian Information Processing Society.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.M. Levine. An essay on browsing. Reference Quarterly, 93:35–36, 1969.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Lowe and W. Hall. Hypermedia and the Web: An Engineering Approach. Wiley, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Marchionini. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Marchionini. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4):41–46, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.B. Morrison, P. Pirolli, and S.K. Card. A taxonomic analysis of what world wide web activities significantly impact people’s decisions and actions. In CHI ’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 163–164, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Olston and E.H. Chi. ScentTrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the web. ACM Transactions Computer–Human Interaction, 10(3):177–197, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Pirolli and S.K. Cart. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A.J. Sellen, R. Murphy, and K.L. Shaw. How knowledge workers use the web. In CHI ’02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 227–234, 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Thuering, J. Hannemann, and J. Haake. Hypermedia and cognition: Designing for comprehension. Communications of the ACM, 38(8):57–66, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Tsandilas and M.C. Schraefel. User-controlled link adaptation. In Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 152–160. ACM, 2003.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Vitali and M. Bieber. Hypermedia on the web: What will it take? ACM Computing Surveys, 31(4es):31, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Wang, A.P. de Vries, and M.J.T. Reinders. Unifying user-based and item-based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development on Information Retrieval (SIGIR06), 2006.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R.W. White, B. Kules, S.M. Drucker, and M.C. Schraefel. Introduction – exploratory search. Communications of the ACM, 49(4):36–39, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    P.T. Zellweger, S.H. Regli, J.D. Mackinlay, and B. Chang. The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: An observational study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 249–256. ACM, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeliz Yesilada
    • 1
  • Sean Bechhofer
    • 1
  • Bernard Horan
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Sun Microsystems LaboratoriesMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations