Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of the Vacuum Pressure in a Vacuum glazing after extreme thermal cycling

  • Yueping Fang
  • Trevor J. Hyde
  • Philip C. Eames
  • Neil Hewitt
Conference paper

Abstract

Details of theoretical and experimental studies of the change in vacuum pressure within a vacuum glazing after extreme thermal cycling are presented. The vacuum glazing was fabricated at low temperature using an indium edge seal. It comprised two 4 mm thick 0.4 m by 0.4 m low-emittance glass panes separated by an array of stainless steel pillars with a diameter of 0.32 mm and a height of 0.2 mm. After thermal cycling in the temperature range-30°C to +50°C on one side of the sample, while maintaining 22°C on the other side, it was found that the glass to glass heat conductance of the sample had increased by 8.2%. The vacuum pressure within the evacuated gap was determined to have increased from 0.01 Pa to 0.15 Pa using the model of Corrucini. This is at the upper limit of the range where the effect of gas pressure on the thermal performance of vacuum glazing can be ignored. The degradation of vacuum level determined was corroborated by the change in glass surface temperatures.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    F. Zoller, “Hollow pane of glass”, German Patent No. 387655, 1924.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    S.J. Robinson and R.E. Collins, “Evacuated windows-theory and practice”, ISES Solar World Congress, International Solar Energy Society, Kobe, Japan, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    P.W. Griffiths, M. Di Leo, P. Cartwright, P.C. Eames, P. Yianoulis, G. Leftheriotis, B. Norton, “Fabrication of evacuated glazing at low temperature”, Solar Energy 63, 243–249, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    T.J. Hyde, P.W. Griffiths, P.C. Eames, B. Norton, “Development of a novel low temperature edge seal for evacuated glazing”. Pro. World Renewable Energy Congress VI, Brighton, U.K. pp271–274, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Y. Fang, P.C. Eames, B. Norton, T.J. Hyde, “Experimental validation of a numerical model for heat transfer in evacuated glazing” Solar Energy 80, 564–577, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    R.E. Collins, T.M. Simko, “Current state of the science and technology of vacuum glazing”, Solar Energy 62 189–213, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    M. Lenzen, G.M. Turner, R.E. Collins, “Thermal outgassing of VACUUM GLAZING”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 1002–1017, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    R.J. Corrucini, “Gaseous heat conduction at low pressure and temperatures”, Vacuum 7–8, 19–29, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    P.C. Eames, B. Norton, A validated unified model for optics and heat transfer in line-axis concentrating solar energy collectors. Solar Energy 50, 339–355, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Y. Fang, An experimental and theoretical investigation into the design, development and performance of evacuated glazing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ulster, UK, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Y. Fang, P.C. Eames, “The effect of glass coating emittance and frame rebate on the heat transfer through vacuum and electrochromic vacuum glazed windows”, Solar Energy Material and Solar Cells, 90, 2683–2695, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yueping Fang
    • 1
  • Trevor J. Hyde
    • 1
  • Philip C. Eames
    • 2
  • Neil Hewitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable Technologies, School of built environmentUniversity of UlsterNewtownabbeyUK
  2. 2.Warwick Institute for Sustainable Energy and Resources, School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations