A Comparative Study of IEEE 802.11 MAC Access Mechanisms for Different Traffic Types

  • Mohammad Saraireh
  • Reza Saatchi
  • Samir Al-khayatt
  • Rebecca Strachan
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 3)

Abstract

The fast growth and development of wireless computer networks and multimedia applications make the Quality of Service (QoS) provided to their transmission an important issue. This paper aims to investigate the impact of varying the number of active stations on the network performance. This was carried out using different data rates. The investigations also considered both MAC protocol access mechanisms, i.e. the basic access and the Request To Send / Clear To Send (RTS/CTS). The effect of traffic type i.e. Constant Bit Rate (CBR) and Variable Bit Rate (VBR) traffics was also examined. The findings revealed that in large networks (larger than 15 stations), the RTS/CTS access mechanism outperformed the basic access mechanism since the performance of the latter was more sensitive to the increase and decrease of the number of active stations. Increasing the data rate improved the network performance in term of delay and jitter but it degraded the network performance in term of channel utilisation and packet loss ratio.

Keywords

Quality of Service (QoS) IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol Network Performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bianchi, G.: Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function. IEEE journal on selected Areas in Communication 18(3), 535–547 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broch, J., Maltz, D., Johnson, D., Hu, Y-C.: A performance Comparison of Multi-hop Wireless Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocol. In: proceedings of IEEE/ACM MobiCom, pp. 85–97. ACM Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  3. Cali, F., Conti, M., Gregori, E.: Dynamic Tuning of the IEEE 802.11 Protocol to Achieve a Theoretical Throughput Limit. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 8(6), 785–799 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coverdate, P.: ITU-T study group 12: Multimedia QoS requirements from a user perspective. In: Workshop on QoS and user perceived Transmission Quality in Evolving Networks (2000)Google Scholar
  5. Haitao, W., Yong, P., Keping, L., Shiduan, C., Jian, M.: Performance of reliable transport protocol over IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN: analysis and enhancement. In: Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Conference on Computer Communications. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol. 2, pp. 599–607. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  6. IEEE standard 802.11, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications (1997)Google Scholar
  7. IEEE standard 802.11, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications (1999)Google Scholar
  8. Kleinrock, L., Tobagi, F.: Packet Switching in Radio Channels: Part 2: The Hidden Terminal Problem in Carrier Sense Multiple-Access and the Busy-Tone Solution. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM 23, 1417–1433 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ns2, The network simulator-ns-2. [Online]. Last accessed on April 5, 2005 at URL http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  10. Sweet, C., Sidhu, D.: Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN Standard (1999) [Online]. Last accessed on August 30, 2004 at URL, http://www.csee.umbc.edu/~sweet/papers/
  11. Thruong, H., Vannuccini, G.: Performance Evaluation of the QoS Enhanced IEEE 802.11e MAC Layer. Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring. In: The 57th IEEE Semiannual, vol. 2, pp. 940–944 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Saraireh
    • 1
  • Reza Saatchi
    • 1
  • Samir Al-khayatt
    • 1
  • Rebecca Strachan
    • 1
  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations