Kin-Recognition Mechanisms in Cooperative Breeding Systems: Ecological Causes and Behavioral Consequences of Variation

  • Jan Komdeur
  • David S. Richardson
  • Ben Hatchwell

The idea that kin selection plays a key role in the evolution of helping behavior is supported by evidence that in many cooperatively breeding vertebrates, helpers assist relatives. However, whether help is directed towards kin through an active kin-selection process or whether it is merely the result of passive coincidence, i.e., because the helpers normally remain on the natal territory where the recipients of help just happen to be relatives has been a long-standing debate. Moreover, the nature and evolution of active kin-discrimination mechanisms that may be used within cooperative breeding (and how these are influenced by the ecology of the species) have, until recently, received little attention. In this review, we discuss the roles of indirect and direct kin-recognition mechanisms on effective kin discrimination, with kin recognition defined in its broader sense as the differential treatment of conspecifics according to their genetic relatedness. In cooperative breeding species, indirect recognition based on spatial rules that reliably predict relatedness can result in effective kin-directed helping. However, direct recognition based on environmental or genetic cues should be able to provide more discriminating mechanisms of kin recognition. Environmentally determined recognition cues and templates could provide an effective means of kin recognition because cooperative breeders are characterized by extended associations with family on stable territories, philopatry, and high adult longevity. Examples of long-term studies that have investigated the use of kin-recognition mechanisms in cooperative breeding vertebrate species are discussed. While there is strong evidence that kin- recognition cues and templates, especially based on vocalizations, can be learned during a period of association with kin, there is no evidence for the use of genetically determined recognition cues or templates. How the ecology of a species may determine the nature and accuracy of the kin recognition mechanism that evolves, and how this will in turn determine the limits of adaptive behavior, is discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold KE, Owens IPF (1998) Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life-history hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:739-745Google Scholar
  2. Beecher MD, Beecher IM, Hahn S (1981) Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows. II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim Behav 29:95-101Google Scholar
  3. Bergmüller R, Heg D, Peer K, Taborsky M (2005) Extended safe havens and between-group dis-persal of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour 142:1643-1667Google Scholar
  4. Blaustein AR, Bekoff M, Daniels TJ (1987) Kin recognition in vertebrates (excluding primates): empirical evidence. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 287-331Google Scholar
  5. Bourke AFG (1997) Sociality and kin selection in insects. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Oxford, Blackwell, pp 203-227Google Scholar
  6. Breed MD, Bennett B (1987) Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 243-285Google Scholar
  7. Breed MD, Welch CK, Cruz R (1994) Kin discrimination within honey bee (Apis mellifera) colo-nies: an analysis of the evidence. Behav Proc 33:25-40Google Scholar
  8. Brown JL (1980) Fitness in complex avian social systems. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Dahlem Konferenzen Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 115-128Google Scholar
  9. Brown JL (1987) Helping and communal breeding in birds. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JL, Brown ER (1990) Mexican jays: uncooperative breeding. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267-288Google Scholar
  11. Clarke MF (1984) Co-operative breeding by the Australian bell miner, Manorina melanophrys Latham: a test of kin-selection theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:137-146Google Scholar
  12. Clarke MF (1989) The pattern of helping in the bell miner Manorina melanophrys. Ethology 80:292-306Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH (2002) Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative verte-brates. Science 296:69-72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, O’Riain MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640-1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Sharpe L, Kansky R, Manser MB, McIlrath GM (2000) Individual contributions to babysitting in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:301-305Google Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Sharpe L, McIrath GM (2001) Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Anim Behav 61:705-710Google Scholar
  17. Cockburn A (1998) Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:141-177Google Scholar
  18. Cockburn A (2003) Cooperative breeding in oscine passerines: does sociality inhibit speciation? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2207-2214Google Scholar
  19. Cockburn A (2004) Mating systems and sexual conflict. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81-101Google Scholar
  20. Connor RC, Curry RL (1995) Helping non-relatives: a role for deceit? Anim Behav 49:389-393Google Scholar
  21. Creel S (1990) How to measure inclusive fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B 241:229-231Google Scholar
  22. Creel S, Creel NM (2002) The African wild dog. Behavior, ecology, and conservation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B (Suppl) 271:S516-S519Google Scholar
  24. Curry RL (1988) Influence of kinship on helping behavior in Galápagos mockingbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:141-152Google Scholar
  25. Curry RL, Grant PR (1990) Galápagos mockingbird: territorial cooperative breeding in a climati-cally variable environment. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, pp 289-332Google Scholar
  26. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species, John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Delay LS, Faaborg J, Naranjo J, Paz SM, DeVries T, Parker PG (1996) Paternal care in the coop-eratively polyandrous Galápagos hawk. Condor 98:300-311Google Scholar
  29. Dickinson JL, Hatchwell BJ (2004) Fitness consequences of helping behavior. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 48-66Google Scholar
  30. Dickinson JL, Koenig WD, Pitelka FA (1996) Fitness consequences of helping behavior in the western bluebird. Behav Ecol 7:168-177Google Scholar
  31. Double MC, Cockburn A (2003) Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:379-384Google Scholar
  32. Dugatkin LA (1997) Cooperation among animals: an evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Mulder RA (1995) Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:339-343Google Scholar
  34. DuPlessis MA (1993) Helping behaviour in cooperatively breeding green wood-hoopoes: selected or unselected trait? Behaviour 127:49-65Google Scholar
  35. Emlen ST (1982) The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. Am Nat 119:29-39Google Scholar
  36. Emlen ST (1991) The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 301-337Google Scholar
  37. Emlen ST (1994) Benefits, constraints and the evolution of the family. Trends Ecol Evol 9:282-285 Emlen ST (1995) An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8092-8099Google Scholar
  38. Emlen ST (1997) Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 228-253Google Scholar
  39. Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1988) The role of kinship in helping decisions among white-fronted bee-eaters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:305-315Google Scholar
  40. Emlen ST, Reeve HK, Sherman PW, Wrege PH, Ratnieks FLW, Shellman-Reeve J (1991) Adaptive versus nonadaptive explanations of behaviour: the case of alloparental helping. Am Nat 138:259-270Google Scholar
  41. Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (1987) Kin recognition in animals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Holmes WG (1991) Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-recogni-tion research: a critical discussion. Ethology 88:109-127Google Scholar
  43. Glen NW, Perrins CM (1988) Cooperative breeding by long-tailed tits. Br Birds 81:630-641Google Scholar
  44. Griffin AS, West S (2003) Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science 302:634-636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Halpin ZT (1991) Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 220-258Google Scholar
  46. Hamilton WD (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97:354-365Google Scholar
  47. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1-52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hatchwell BJ (1999) Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. Am Nat 154:205-219Google Scholar
  49. Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J (2000) Ecological constraints, life-history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav 59:1079-1086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hatchwell BJ, Sharp SP (2006) Kin selection, constraints and the evolution of cooperative breed-ing in long-tailed tits. Adv Stud Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  51. Hatchwell BJ, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, McGowan A (2001a) Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:885-890Google Scholar
  52. Hatchwell BJ, Anderson C, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, Blackwell PG (2001b) Social organisation in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: kinship and spatial dynamics. J Anim Ecol 70:820-830Google Scholar
  53. Hatchwell BJ, Ross DJ, Chaline N, Fowlie MK, Burke T (2002) Parentage in cooperatively breed-ing long-tailed tits. Anim Behav 64:55-63Google Scholar
  54. Hatchwell BJ, Russell AF, MacColl ADC, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, McGowan A (2004) Helpers increase long-term but not short-term productivity in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Behav Ecol 15:1-10Google Scholar
  55. Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci 24:609-616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Haydock J, Koenig WD, Stanback MT (2001) Shared parentage and incest avoidance in the coop-eratively breeding acorn woodpecker. Mol Ecol 10:1515-1525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Heinsohn RG (1991) Kidnapping and reciprocity in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Anim Behav 41:1097-1110Google Scholar
  58. Hepper PG (1991) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Holzer B, Kümmerli R, Keller L, Chapuisat M (2006) Sham nepotism as a result of intrinsic dif-ferences in brood viability in ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2049-2052Google Scholar
  60. Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T (1999) Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim Behav 57:1175-1183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Keller L (1997) Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. Trends Ecol Evol 12:99-103Google Scholar
  62. Keller L, Ross KG (1998) Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394:573-575Google Scholar
  63. Koenig WD, Haydock J (2004) Incest avoidance. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 142-156Google Scholar
  64. Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (2004) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Komdeur J (1992) Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for the evolution of coop-erative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature 358:493-495Google Scholar
  66. Komdeur J (1994) The effect of kinship on helping in the cooperative breeding Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Proc R Soc Lond B 256:47-52Google Scholar
  67. Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanisms in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol 14:237-241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Komdeur J, Richardson DS, Burke T (2004) Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:963-969Google Scholar
  69. Lessells CM (1990) Helpers at the nest in European bee-eaters: who helps and why? In: Blondel J, Gosler A, Lebreton JD, McCleery R (eds) Population biology of passerine birds, an integrated approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357-368Google Scholar
  70. Ligon DL (1983) Cooperation and reciprocity in avian social systems. Am Nat 121:366-384Google Scholar
  71. MacColl ADC, Hatchwell BJ (2004) Determinants of lifetime fitness in a cooperative breeder, the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus. J Anim Ecol 73:1137-1148Google Scholar
  72. McGowan A, Woodburn RJW, Hatchwell BJ (2003) The effect of helping behaviour on the sur-vival of juvenile and adult long-tailed tits (Aegithalos caudatus). J Anim Ecol 72:491-499Google Scholar
  73. Magrath RD, Whittingham LA (1997) Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding white-browed scrubwrens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:185-192Google Scholar
  74. Marzluff JM, Balda RP (1990) Pinyon jays: making the best of a bad situation by helping. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 197-237Google Scholar
  75. Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2000) Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:695-700Google Scholar
  76. Mateo JM (2006) Development of individually distinct recognition cues. Dev Psychobiol 48:508-519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Maynard Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145-1147Google Scholar
  78. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  79. Mumme RL (1992) Do helpers increase reproductive success? An experimental analysis in the Florida scrub jay. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:319-328Google Scholar
  80. Mumme RL, Koenig WD, Ratnieks FLW (1989) Helping behaviour, reproductive value, and the future component of indirect fitness. Anim Behav 38:331-343Google Scholar
  81. Nakagawa S, Waas JR (2004) The effect of acoustic and visual priming stimuli on the reproductive behaviour of female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Acta Ethol 7:43-49Google Scholar
  82. Nowicki S (1983) Flock-specific recognition of chickadee calls. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:317-320Google Scholar
  83. Painter JN, Crozier RH, Poiani A, Robertson RJ, Clarke MF (2000) Complex social organization reflects genetic structure and relatedness in the cooperatively breeding bell miner, Manorina melanophrys. Mol Ecol 9:1339-1347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Payne RB, Payne LL, Rowley I (1988) Kin and social relationships in splendid fairy-wrens: rec-ognition by song in a cooperative bird. Anim Behav 36:1341-1351Google Scholar
  85. Payne RB, Payne LL, Rowley I, Russell EM (1991) Social recognition and response to song in cooperative red-winged fairy wrens. Auk 108:811-819Google Scholar
  86. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401:155-157Google Scholar
  87. Piper WH (1994) Courtship, copulation, nesting behavior and brood parasitism in the Venezuelan stripe-backed wren. Condor 96:654-671Google Scholar
  88. Price JJ (1998) Family- and sex-specific vocal traditions in a cooperatively breeding songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:497-450Google Scholar
  89. Price JJ (1999) Recognition of family-specific calls in stripe-backed wrens. Anim Behav 57:483-492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201-206Google Scholar
  91. Rabenold KN (1985) Cooperation in breeding by non-reproductive wrens: kinship, reciprocity and demography. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:1-17Google Scholar
  92. Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407-435Google Scholar
  93. Reyer HU (1980) Flexible helper structure as an ecological adaptation in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis rudis L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:219-227Google Scholar
  94. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J, Burke T (2001) Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechel-lensis). Mol Ecol 10:2263-2273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J (2002) Direct benefits explain the evolution of female biased cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warblers. Evolution 56:2313-2321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T (2003a) Altruism and infidelity among warblers. Nature 422:580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J (2003b) Sex-specific associative learning cues and inclusive fitness benefits in the Seychelles warbler. J Evol Biol 16:854-861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Robertson BC (1996) Vocal mate recognition in a monogamous, flock-forming bird, the silvereye, Zosterops lateralis. Anim Behav 51:303-311Google Scholar
  99. Rood JP (1990) Group size, survival, reproduction, and routes to breeding in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 39:566-572Google Scholar
  100. Roulin A (2002) Why do lactating females nurse alien offspring? A review of hypotheses and empirical evidence. Anim Behav 63:201-208Google Scholar
  101. Russell EM (1989) Cooperative breeding: a Gondwanan perspective. Emu 89:61-62Google Scholar
  102. Russell AF, Hatchwell BJ (2001) Experimental evidence for kin-biased helping in a cooperatively breeding vertebrate. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2169-2174Google Scholar
  103. Sharp SP, Hatchwell BJ (2005) Individuality in the contact calls of cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Behaviour 434:1127-1130Google Scholar
  104. Sharp SP, McGowan A, Wood MJ, Hatchwell BJ (2005) Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird. Nature 434:1127-1130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Sherley GH (1990) Cooperative breeding in reflemen (Acanthissitta chloris) benefits to parents, offspring and helpers. Behaviour 112:1-22Google Scholar
  106. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, pp 69-96Google Scholar
  107. Shorey L, Barnard CJ, Hurst JL (1994) Kin-biased behaviour in male wild house mice: mixed paternity grouping and group member versus kin discrimination. Ethology 97:141-160Google Scholar
  108. Stacey PB, Koenig W (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  109. Stiver KA, Dierkes P, Taborsky M, Balshine S (2004) Dispersal patterns and status change in a co-operatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher: evidence from microsatellite analy-ses and behavioural observations. J Fish Biol 65:91-105Google Scholar
  110. Taborsky M (1994) Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv Stud Behav 23:1-100Google Scholar
  111. Vehrencamp SL, Ritter AF, Keever M, Bradbury JW (2003) Responses to playback of local vs. distant contact calls in the orange-fronted conure, Aratinga canicularis. Ethology 109:37-54Google Scholar
  112. Walters JR (1990) Red-cockaded woodpeckers: a ‘primitive’ cooperative breeder. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69-101Google Scholar
  113. Wanker R, Apcin J, Jennerjahn B, Waibel B (1998) Discrimination of different social companions in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:197-202Google Scholar
  114. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72-75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Whittingham LA, Dunn PO, Magrath RD (1997) Relatedness, polyandry and extra-group pater-nity in the cooperatively breeding white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:261-270Google Scholar
  116. Wiley RH, Hatchwell BJ, Davies NB (1991) Recognition of individual males’ songs by female dunnocks: a mechanism increasing the number of copulatory partners and reproductive suc-cess. Ethology 88:145-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  118. Woolfenden G, Fitzpatrick J (1984) The Florida scrub jay: demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  119. Zahavi A (1990) Arabian babblers: the quest for social status in a cooperative breeder. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behav-iour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 105-130Google Scholar
  120. Zahavi A (1995) Altruism as a handicap - the limitations of kin selection and reciprocity. J Avian Biol 26:1-3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Komdeur
    • 1
  • David S. Richardson
    • 2
  • Ben Hatchwell
    • 3
  1. 1.Animal Ecology GroupUniversity of GroningenNetherlands
  2. 2.Centre for EcologyUniversity of East AngliaUK
  3. 3.Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations