Advertisement

A Clinically Motivated 2-Fold Framework for Quantifying and Classifying Immunohistochemically Stained Specimens

  • Bonnie Hall
  • Wenjin Chen
  • Michael Reiss
  • David J. Foran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4792)

Abstract

Motivated by the current limitations of automated quantitative image analysis in discriminating among intracellular immunohistochemical (IHC) staining patterns, this paper presents a two-fold approach for IHC characterization that utilizes both the protein stain information and the surrounding tissue architecture. Through the use of a color unmixing algorithm, stained tissue sections are automatically decomposed into the IHC stain, which visualizes the target protein, and the counterstain which provides an objective indication of the underlying histologic architecture. Feature measures are subsequently extracted from both staining planes. In order to characterize the IHC expression pattern, this approach exploits the use of a non-traditional feature based on textons. Novel biologically motivated filter banks are introduced in order to derive texture signatures for different IHC staining patterns. Systematic experiments using this approach were used to classify breast cancer tissue microarrays which had been previously prepared using immuno-targeted nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane stains.

Keywords

Quantitative IHC analysis texture descriptors expression signatures automated classification breast cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Hilbe, W., Gachter, A., Duba, H.C., Dirnhofer, S., Eisterer, W., Schmid, T., Mildner, A., Bodner, J., Woll, E.: Comparison of automated cellular imaging system and manual microscopy for immunohistochemically stained cryostat sections of lung cancer specimens applying, p. 53, ki-67 and p. 120. Oncol Rep 10, 15–20 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camp, R.L., Chung, G.G., Rimm, D.L.: Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays. Nat. Med. 8, 1323–1327 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis, C.M., Dyson, M.J., Stephenson, T.J., Maltby, E.L.: HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques. J. Clin. Pathol. 58, 710–714 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, S., Saboorian, M.H., Frenkel, E.P., Haley, B.B., Siddiqui, M.T., Gokaslan, S., Wians, F.H., Hynan Jr, L., Ashfaq, R.: Assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer. Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS)-assisted quantitation of immunohistochemical assay achieves high accuracy in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization assay as the standard. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 116, 495–503 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, K.Y., Shia, J., Kemeny, N.E., et al.: Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1803–1810 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang, J., Zubovitz, J., Petrocelli, T., et al.: PKB/Akt phosphorylates p. 27, impairs nuclear import of p. 27 and opposes p27-mediated G1 arrest. Nat. Med. 8, 1153–1160 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosen, D.G., Yang, G., Cai, K.Q., Bast Jr, R.C., Gershenson, D.M., Silva, E.G., Liu, J.: Subcellular localization of p. 27 kip 1 expression predicts poor prognosis in human ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 632–637 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, W., Reiss, M., Foran, D.J.: A prototype for unsupervised analysis of tissue microarrays for cancer research and diagnostics. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 8, 89–96 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leung, T., Malik, J.: Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. Int. J. Comput Vision 43, 29–44 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: A statistical approach to texture classification from single images. Int. J. Comput Vision 62, 61–81 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haralick, R.: Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man. Cyber. SMC-3, 610–621 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmid, C.: Constructing models for content-based image retrieval. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 39–45 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man. Cyber. 9, 62–66 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slamon, D.J., Godolphin, W., Jones, L.A., Holt, J.A., Wong, S.G., Keith, D.E., Levin, W.J., Stuart, S.G., Udove, J., Ullrich, A., et al.: Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 244, 707–712 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie Hall
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wenjin Chen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Michael Reiss
    • 3
    • 4
  • David J. Foran
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Biomedical Imaging and Informatics 
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Biomedical Sciences 
  3. 3.The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 
  4. 4.Dept. of Internal Medicine and Dept. of Molecular Genetics, Microbiology, and Immunology, 195 Little Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08903USA

Personalised recommendations