A Robot System for Biomimetic Navigation – From Snapshots to Metric Embeddings of View Graphs
Complex navigation behaviour (way-finding) involves recognizing several places and encoding a spatial relationship between them. Way-finding skills can be classified into a hierarchy according to the complexity of the tasks that can be performed . The most basic form of way-finding is route navigation, followed by topological navigation where several routes are integrated into a graph-like representation. The highest level, survey navigation, is reached when this graph can be embedded into a common reference frame.
In this chapter, we present the building blocks for a biomimetic robot navigation system that encompasses all levels of this hierarchy. As a local navigation method, we use scene-based homing. In this scheme, a goal location is characterized either by a panoramic snapshot of the light intensities as seen from the place, or by a record of the distances to the surrounding objects. The goal is found by moving in the direction that minimizes the discrepancy between the recorded intensities or distances and the current sensory input. For learning routes, the robot selects distinct views during exploration that are close enough to be reached by snapshot-based homing. When it encounters already visited places during route learning, it connects the routes and thus forms a topological representation of its environment termed a view graph. The final stage, survey navigation, is achieved by a graph embedding procedure which complements the topologic information of the view graph with odometric position estimates. Calculation of the graph embedding is done with a modified multidimensional scaling algorithm which makes use of distances and angles between nodes.
KeywordsMobile Robot Robot System View Graph Exploration Direction View Distance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Borenstein, J., Feng, L.: Measurement and correction of systematic odometry errors in mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(5) (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Duckett, T., Marsland, S., Shapiro, J.: Fast, on–line learning of globally consistent maps. Autonomous Robots (12), 287–300 (2002)Google Scholar
- 11.Frese, U., Duckett, T.: A multigrid approach for accelerating relaxation-based slam. In: RUR 2003. Proc. IJCAI Workshop on Reasoning with Uncertainty in Robotics, pp. 39–46 (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Frese, U., Hirzinger, G.: Simultaneous localization and mapping – a discussion. In: Fox, D., Saffiotti, A. (eds.) RUR 2001. Proceedings of the IJCAI–2001 Workshop on Reasoning with Uncertainty in Robotics (2001)Google Scholar
- 13.Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., Rizzi, S.: Elastic correction of dead–reckoning errors in map building. In: IROS 1998. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada, pp. 905–911 (1998)Google Scholar
- 17.Mallot, H.A.: Behavior-oriented approaches to cognition: Theoretical perspectives. Theory in Biosciences 116, 192–220 (1997)Google Scholar
- 18.Owen, C., Nehmzow, U.: Landmark-based navigation for a mobile robot. In: Pfeifer, R., Blumberg, B., Meyer, J.-A., Wilson, S.W. (eds.) From animals to animats. Proc. SAB 1998, vol. 5, pp. 145–240. MIT Press, Cambridge, London (1998)Google Scholar