Advertisement

Strategic Games on Defense Trees

  • Stefano Bistarelli
  • Marco Dall’Aglio
  • Pamela Peretti
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4691)

Abstract

In this paper we use defense trees, an extension of attack trees with countermeasures, to represent attack scenarios and game theory to detect the most promising actions attacker and defender. On one side the attacker wants to break the system (with as little efforts as possible), on the opposite side the defender want to protect it (sustaining the minimum cost).

As utility function for the attacker and for the defender we consider economic indexes (like the Return on Investment (ROI) and the Return on Attack (ROA)). We show how our approach can be used to evaluate effectiveness and economic profitability of countermeasures as well as their deterrent effect on attackers, thus providing decision makers with a useful tool for performing better evaluation of IT security investments during the risk management process.

Keywords

Security Risk Analysis Game Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bistarelli, S., Fioravanti, F., Peretti, P.: Defense tree for economic evaluations of security investment. In: 1st International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2006), pp. 416–423 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, D.D., Wilson, D.R.: A comparison of commercial and military computer security policies. In: IEEE Symposium on Computer Security and Privacy (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cremonini, M., Martini, P.: Evaluating information security investments from attackers perspective: the Return-On-Attack (ROA). In: Fourth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (June 2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foster, N.L.: The application of software and safety engineering techniques to security protocol development. PhD thesis, University of York, Department of Computer Science (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibbons, R.: A Primer in Game Theory. Pearson Higher Education (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P.: The economics of information security investment. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 5(4), 438–457 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howard, LeBlanc.: Writing Secure Code. Microsoft Press, Redmond (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krutz, R.L., Vines, R.D., Stroz, E.M.: The CISSP Prep Guide: Mastering the Ten Domains of Computer Security. Wiley, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, Y.: Intrusion Detection for Wireless Networks. PhD thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McKelvey, R.D., McLennan, A.M., Turocy, T.L.: Gambit: Software tools for game theory (version 0.2006.01.20) (2006), http://econweb.tamu.edu/gambit
  12. 12.
    Meritt, J.W.: A method for quantitative risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the 22nd National Information Systems Security Conference (October 1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborne, M.J.: An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schechter, S.E.: Computer Security Strength & Risk: A Quantitative Approach. PhD thesis, Harvard University (May 2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneier, B.: Attack trees: Modeling security threats. Dr. Dobb’s Journal (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneier, B.: Secrets & Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sonnenreich, W., Albanese, J., Stout, B.: Return On Security Investment (ROSI): A practical quantitative model. In: Security in Information Systems, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Security in Information Systems, WOSIS 2005, pp. 239–252. INSTICC Press (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A., Feringa, A.: Risk management guide for information technology systems. Nist special publication 800–830, NIST, National Institute of Standard Technology (July 2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Bistarelli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marco Dall’Aglio
    • 1
  • Pamela Peretti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio”, PescaraItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Informatica e Telematica, CNR, PisaItaly

Personalised recommendations