A p2p Framework for Interacting with Learning Objects

  • Andrea Clematis
  • Paola Forcheri
  • Alfonso Quarati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4753)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a distributed scenario in which users may express their comments about Learning Objects (LO), and point out relationships among them. Considering comments we associate ranks to each LO. The relationships allow users to evolve from a local view, based on the analysis of a single LO, to an enlarged perspective of a network of them. The implementation of such environment in a Super Peer Network is outlined.

Keywords

Learning objects Distributed systems Super peer networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ternier, S., Duval, E., Neven, F.: Using a p2p architecture to provide interoperability between LearningObjects. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 148–151 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacLoad, D.: Learning Object Repositories: Deployment and Diffusion, CANARIE discussion paper, CANARIE inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGreal, R., Anderson, T., Babin, G., Downes, S., Friesen, N., Harrigan, K., Hatala, M., MacLeod, D., Mattson, M., Paquette, G., Richards, G., Roberts, T., Schafer, S.: EduSource: Canada’s Learning Object Repository Network. Int. J. of Instructional Technology and Distant Learning 1(3) (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Downes, S.: Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context. USDLA Journal, 17 (1) (2003), http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/JAN03_Issue/article01.html
  5. 5.
    Busetti, E., Dettori, G., Forcheri, P., Ierardi, M.G.: Guidelines towards effectively sharable LOs. In: Liu, W., Shi, Y., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3143, pp. 416–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busetti, E., Dettori, G., Forcheri, P., Ierardi, M.G., Molfino, M.T.: Repositories of Learning Objects as Learning Environments for Teachers. In: Proceedings of ICALT 2004, pp. 450–454. IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, B., Garcia-Molina, H.: Designing a super-peer network (2002), http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/2002-13
  8. 8.
    Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmer, M., Risch, T., Edutella, A.: p2p Networking Infrastructure Based on RDF. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 604–615 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neidl, W., Wolpers, M., Siberski, W., Schmitz, C., Schlosser, M., Brunkhorst, I., Loser, A.: Super-peer-based routing strategies for RDF-based peer-to-peer networks. Journal of Web Semantics, 177–186 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, G., Jin, Q., Shih, T.K.: Peer-to-Peer Based Social Interaction Tools in Ubiquitous. ICPADS 1, 230–236 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leighton, G., Müldner, T.: Applying Peer-To-Peer Technology to the Building of Distributed Educational Systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 16(3), 295–315 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Clematis
    • 1
  • Paola Forcheri
    • 1
  • Alfonso Quarati
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche del CNR, GenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations