Improving the Search for Learning Objects with Keywords and Ontologies

  • Lothar Lemnitzer
  • Cristina Vertan
  • Alex Killing
  • Kiril Simov
  • Diane Evans
  • Dan Cristea
  • Paola Monachesi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4753)

Abstract

We report on an ongoing project which aims at improving the effectiveness of retrieval and accessibility of learning object within learning management systems and learning object repositories. The project Language Technology for eLearning approaches this task by providing Language Technology based functionalities and by integrating semantic knowledge through domain-specific ontologies. We will report about the development of a keyword extractor and a domain-specific ontology, the integration of these modules into the learning management system ILIAS and the validation of these tools which assesses their added value in the scenario of searching learning objects across different languages.

Keywords

learning object metadata keyword extraction ontology multilinguality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Final Draft, IEEE P1484.12.1 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OWL. Web Ontology Language (Overview), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
  3. 3.
    Bruce, R., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing subjectivity: A case study of manual tagging. Natural Language Engineering 5(2), 187–205 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Church, K., Gale, W.: Poisson mixtures. Natural Language Engineering 1(2), 163–190 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Church, K., Kenneth, W., Gale, W.: Inverse Document Frequency (IDF): A Measure of Deviations from Poisson. In: Proc. of Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fellbaum, C.: WORDNET: an electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gangemi, A., Navigli, R., Velardi, P.: The OntoWordNet Project: extension and axiomatisation of conceptual relations in WordNet. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mossel, E., Lemnitzer, L., Vertan, C.: Language Technology for eLearning – A Multilingual Approach from the German Perspective. In: Proc. GLDV-2007 Spring Conference, Tübingen, pp. 125–134 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piek, V. (ed.): EuroWordNet General Document. Version 3, Final (July 19, 1998) (1999), http://www.hum.uva.nl/~ewn
  11. 11.
    Sclano, F., Velardi, P.: TermExtractor: a Web Application to Learn the Shared Terminology of Emergent Web Communities. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications I-ESA 2007, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal (to appear, 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lothar Lemnitzer
    • 1
  • Cristina Vertan
    • 2
  • Alex Killing
    • 3
  • Kiril Simov
    • 4
  • Diane Evans
    • 5
  • Dan Cristea
    • 6
  • Paola Monachesi
    • 7
  1. 1.Seminar für Sprachwissenchaft, Universität TübingenGermany
  2. 2.Natural Language Systems Divison, Institute or Informatics, University HamburgGermany
  3. 3.Center for Security Studies, ETH ZürichSwitzerland
  4. 4.LML, IPP, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, SofiaBulgaria
  5. 5.The Open University, Milton KeynesUK
  6. 6.University of IasiRomania
  7. 7.Utrecht University, Uil-OTS, UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations