How Do People Learn at the Workplace? Investigating Four Workplace Learning Assumptions

  • Jose Kooken
  • Tobias Ley
  • Robert de Hoog
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4753)

Abstract

Any software development project is based on assumptions about the state of the world that probably will hold when it is fielded. Investigating whether they are true can be seen as an important task. This paper describes how an empirical investigation was designed and conducted for the EU funded APOSDLE project. This project aims at supporting informal learning during work. Four basic assumptions are derived from the project plan and subsequently investigated in a two-phase study using several methods, including workplace observations and a survey. The results show that most of the assumptions are valid in the current work context of knowledge workers. In addition more specific suggestions for the design of the prospective APOSDLE application could be derived. Though requiring a substantial effort, carrying out studies like this can be seen as important for longer term software development projects.

Keywords

workplace learning multi-method approach informal learning learning bottlenecks task driven learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grudin, J.: Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In: CSCW 1988. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 85–93. ACM, New York (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grudin, J.: Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37(1), 93–105 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vassileva, J., Deters, R., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Bull, S., Kettel, L.: Lessons from Deploying I-Help. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Multi-Agent Architectures for Distributed Learning Environments (AIED 2001), San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 3–11 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., Ramage, M.: What are workplace studies for? In: Marmolin, H., Sunblad, Y., Schmidt, K. (eds.) ECSCW 1995. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 309–324. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindstaedt, S.N., Mayer, H.: A Storyboard of the APOSDLE Vision. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) EC-TEL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4227, pp. 628–633. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collin, K.: Connecting work and learning: design engineers’ learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning 18(7/8), 403–413 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Twidale, M.B.: Over the shoulder learning: supporting brief informal learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14(6), 505–547 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiemstra, R.: Self-directed learning. In: Husen, T., Postlethwaite, T.N. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd edn., Pergamon Press, Oxford (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Livingstone, D.W.: Adults’ Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps and Future Research. Position paper for the Advisory Panel of Experts on Adult Learning, Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olgren, C.: Learning Strategies for Learning Technologies. In: Burge, E.J. (ed.) The Strategic Use of Learning Technologies. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol. 88, pp. 7–16. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hiemstra, R.: Self-directed adult learning. In: de Corte, E., Weinert, F.E. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology, pp. 771–777. Pergamon, Oxford/New York (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Montalvo, F.T., Torres, M.C.G.: Self-regulated learning: current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 2(1), 1–34 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warr, Allan, Bidi: Predicting three levels of training outcome. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72(3), 351–375 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eraut, M.: Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology 70, 113–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: A Knowledge Management Ontology. In: Holsapple, C.W. (ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management, vol. 1, pp. 89–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holman, D., Epitropaki, O., Fernie, S.: Short research note. Understanding learning strategies in the workplace: A factor analytic investigation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74, 675–681 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rieman, J.: A field study of exploratory learning strategies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 3(3), 189–218 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skalski, P.D.: Resource C: Computer content analysis. In: Neuendorf, K. (ed.) The content analysis guidebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feldman, S.: The high cost of not finding information. KMWorld 13(3) (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartlett, J.: Knowing people. Knowledge management (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose Kooken
    • 1
  • Tobias Ley
    • 2
  • Robert de Hoog
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Know-Center, Inffeldgasse 21a, 8010 GrazAustria

Personalised recommendations