Challenges in Business Performance Measurement: The Case of a Corporate IT Function

  • Stephen Corea
  • Andy Watters
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4714)

Abstract

Contemporary organisations are increasingly adopting performance measurement activity to assess their level of achievement of strategic objectives and delivery of stakeholder value. This qualitative research sought to increase understanding of the challenges involved in this area. An in-depth case study of the corporate IT services unit of a global company highlighted key challenges pertaining to: (i) deriving value from performance measurement practices; (ii) establishing appropriate and useful performance measures; (iii) implementing effective information collation and dashboard practices. The need to transform performance measurement from a tool for simply monitoring/reporting to one of learning what factors drive results (so as to be able to influence these factors) is suggested as a way to increase the value derived from such practices. This is seen to imply a need to rethink major notions of balance and strategic relevance that have been advanced hitherto as leading design principles.

Keywords

Performance measurement dashboards IT evaluation strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourne, M., Franco, M., Wilkes, J.: Corporate Performance Management. Measuring Business Excellence 7, 15–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bukowitz, W.R., Petrash, G.P.: Visualising, measuring, and managing knowledge. Research and Technology Management 40, 24–31 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cross, K.F., Lynch, R.L.: The SMART way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review 9, 23–33 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Toni, A., Tonchia, S.: Performance measurement systems - models, characteristics and measures. International Journal of Productions and Operations Management 1, 347–354 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J., Vollmann, T.E.: The new performance challenge: Measuring operations for world-class competition, Homewood, IL, Dow Jones-Irwin (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eckerson, W.: Performance Dashboards: Measuring Monitoring and Managing Your Business. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Few, S.: Dashboard Design: Beyond Meters, Gauges, ad Traffic Lights. Business Intelligence Journal 10, 18–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frolick, M.N., Ariyachandra, T.R.: Business Performance Management: One Truth. Information Systems Management 23(1), 41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The discovery of grounded theory, Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F.: Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10, 205–238 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, H.T.: The search for gain in markets and firms: a review of the historical emergence of management accounting systems. Accounting, Organisations and Society 16, 63–80 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70, 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 23(2), 213–229 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, H., Myers, M.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lea, R., Parker, B.: The JIT Spiral of Continuous Improvement. IMDS 4, 10–13 (1989)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehn, K., Makhija, A.K.: EVA and MVA as performance measures and signals for strategic change. Strategy and Leadership 24, 34–38 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCunn, P.: The Balanced Scorecard: the eleventh commandment. Management Accounting, pp. 34–36 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Medori, D., Steeple, D.: A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20, 520–533 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neely, A., Adams, C., Crowe, P.: The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence 5(2), 6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Bourne, M.: Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., Bourne, M.: Designing performance measures: a structured approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 17, 1131–1152 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skinner, W.: The decline, fall and renewal of manufacturing. Industrial Engineering, pp. 32–38 (1974)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stanwick, P., Stanwick, S.: IT Performance: How Do You Measure a Moving Target? The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance 13, 19–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watson, H., Frolick, M.: Determining Information Requirements for an EIS. MIS Quarterly 17, 52–67 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Corea
    • 1
  • Andy Watters
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Systems Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7ALUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.SAP, Feltham, Middlesex, TW14 8HDUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations