Uncovering Fraud in Direct Marketing Data with a Fraud Auditing Case Builder
This paper illustrates an automated system that replicates the investigative operation of human fraud auditors. Human fraud auditors often utilize fraud detection methods that exploit structure in database tables to uncover outliers that may be part of a fraud case. From the uncovered outliers, an auditor will build a case of fraud by searching data related to the outlier possibly across many different databases and tables within these different databases. This paper illustrates an industrial implementation of an adaptive fraud case building system that uses machine learning to conduct the search and decision-making process with an automated outlier detection component. This system was successfully applied to uncover fraud cases in real marketing data.
KeywordsFraud Detection Benford’s Law Reinforcement Learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Dictionary.com (2007), http://www.dictionary.com
- 2.Crowder, N.: Fraud Detection Techniques. Internal Auditor, 17–20 (1997)Google Scholar
- 3.Fawcett, T.: AI Approaches to Fraud Detection & Risk Management. Technical Report WS-97-07, AAAI Workshop: Technical Report (1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Nigrini, M.J.: Digital Analysis Using Benford’s Law. Global Audit Publications, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Nigrini, M.J.: Can Benford’s Law Be Used In Forensic Accounting? The Balance Sheet, pp. 7–8 (1993)Google Scholar
- 8.Hill, T.P.: A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science 4, 354–363 (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Carslaw, C.A.: Anomalies in Income Numbers: Evidence of Goal Oriented Behaviour. The Accounting Review 63, 321–327 (1988)Google Scholar
- 10.Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Sutton, R.S.: Learning to predict by the method of Temporal Differences. Machine Learning 3, 9–44 (1988)Google Scholar