Modeling Decentralized Organizational Change in Honeybee Societies

  • Mark Hoogendoorn
  • Martijn C. Schut
  • Jan Treur
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4648)

Abstract

Multi-agent organizations in dynamic environments, need to have the ability to adapt to environmental changes to ensure a continuation of proper functioning. Such adaptations can be made through a centralized decision process or come from the individuals within the organization. In the domain of social insects, such as honeybees and wasps, organizations are known to adapt in a decentralized fashion to environmental changes. An organizational model for decentralized organizational change is presented that can aid in analyzing and designing such organizations. The model is specified by dynamic properties at different aggregation levels. At the lowest level such properties characterize the behavior of individual roles, which can be related to higher level properties that express important elements such as survival of an organization. A honeybee colony is used as a case study.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonebeau, E., Theraulaz, G.: Swarm Smarts. Scientific American 282(3), 72–79 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.L., Franks, N.R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E.: Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furtado, V., Melo, A., Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Sonenberg, L.: Exploring congruence between organizational structure and task performance: a simulation approach. In: Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Matson, E., Sichman, J. (eds.) Proc. of the 1st OOOP Workshop (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.): Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV. LNCS, vol. 2935. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C.M., Schut, M., Treur, J.: Modeling Centralized Organization of Organizational Change. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 13, 147–184 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Compositional verification of multi-agent systems: a formal analysis of pro-activeness and reactiveness. Int. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 11, 51–92 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCallum, M., Vasconcelos, W.W., Norman, T.J.: Verification and Analysis of Organisational Change. In: Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Matson, E., Sichman, J. (eds.) Proc. 1st OOOP Workshop (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schultz, D.J., Barron, A.B., Robinson, G.E.: A Role for Octopamine in Honey Bee Division of Labor. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 60, 350–359 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Temporal Trace Language: Syntax and Semantics, Technical Report, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, A’dam (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.L.: Response thresholds reinforcement and division of labor in insect societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265, 327–332 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winston, M.L., Punnet, E.N.: Factors determining temporal division of labor in honeybees. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 2947–2952 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Hoogendoorn
    • 1
  • Martijn C. Schut
    • 1
  • Jan Treur
    • 1
  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Artificial Intelligence, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations