Institutional Robotics

  • Porfírio Silva
  • Pedro U. Lima
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4648)

Abstract

Pioneer approaches to Artificial Intelligence have traditionally neglected, in a chronological sequence, the agent body, the world where the agent is situated, and the other agents. With the advent of Collective Robotics approaches, important progresses were made toward embodying and situating the agents, together with the introduction of collective intelligence. However, the currently used models of social environments are still rather poor, jeopardizing the attempts of developing truly intelligent robot teams. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for a new approach to the design of multi-robot systems, mainly inspired by concepts from Institutional Economics, an alternative to mainstream neoclassical economic theory. Our approach intends to sophisticate the design of robot collectives by adding, to the currently popular emergentist view, the concepts of physically and socially bounded autonomy of cognitive agents, uncoupled interaction among them and deliberately set up coordination devices.

Keywords

Collective Robotics Institutional Economics Institutional Robotics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weyns, D., Parunak, H.: v. In: Weyns, D., Parunak, H.V.D., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3374, pp. 1–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haselager, W.F.G.: Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy. Pragmatics & Cognition 13(3), 515–532 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. The University College London Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castro Caldas, J., Coelho, H.: The Origin of Institutions: socio-economic processes, choice, norms and conventions. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2(2) (1999), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/2/2/1.html
  6. 6.
    Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lansing, J.S.: Artificial Societies” and the Social Sciences. Artificial Life 8, 279–292 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hexmoor, H., Venkata, S.G., Hayes, R.: Modelling social norms in multiagent systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 18(1), 49–71 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malsch, T., Weiß, G.: Conflicts in social theory and multiagent systems: on importing sociological insights into distributed AI. In: Tessier, C., Chaudron, L., Müller, H.-J. (eds.) Conflicting Agents. Conflict Management in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 111–149. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malsch, T., Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Socionics: Sociological Concepts for Social Systems of Artificial (and Human) Agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(1) (2007), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/1/11.html
  12. 12.
    Hahn, C., Fley, B., Florian, M., Spresny, D., Fischer, K.: Social Reputation: a Mechanism for Flexible Self-Regulation of Multiagent Systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alonso, E.: Rights and Argumentation in Open Multi-Agent Systems. Artificial Intelligence Review 21(1), 3–24 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durfee, E.H.: Challenges to Scaling Up Agent Coordination Strategies. In: Wagner, T.A. (ed.) An Application Science for Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 113–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weyns, D., Schumacher, M., Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Holvoet, T.: Environments in Multiagent Systems. The Knowledge Engineer Review 20(2), 127–141 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tummolini, L., Castelfranchi, C.: The cognitive and behavioral mediation of institutions: Towards an account of institutional actions. Cognitive Systems Research 7(2-3), 307–323 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hodgson, G.M.: Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Polity Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dias, M.B., Zlot, R.M., Kalra, N., Stentz, A.: Market-based multirobot coordination: a survey and analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE 94(7), 1257–1270 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lima, P.U., Custódio, L.M.: Multi-Robot Systems. In: Innovations in Robot Mobility and Control. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 8, pp. 1–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Porfírio Silva
    • 1
  • Pedro U. Lima
    • 2
  1. 1.Philosophy Department, Faculdade de Letras, University of Lisbon 
  2. 2.Institute for Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon 

Personalised recommendations