Pioneer approaches to Artificial Intelligence have traditionally neglected, in a chronological sequence, the agent body, the world where the agent is situated, and the other agents. With the advent of Collective Robotics approaches, important progresses were made toward embodying and situating the agents, together with the introduction of collective intelligence. However, the currently used models of social environments are still rather poor, jeopardizing the attempts of developing truly intelligent robot teams. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for a new approach to the design of multi-robot systems, mainly inspired by concepts from Institutional Economics, an alternative to mainstream neoclassical economic theory. Our approach intends to sophisticate the design of robot collectives by adding, to the currently popular emergentist view, the concepts of physically and socially bounded autonomy of cognitive agents, uncoupled interaction among them and deliberately set up coordination devices.
KeywordsCollective Robotics Institutional Economics Institutional Robotics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
- 2.Weyns, D., Parunak, H.: v. In: Weyns, D., Parunak, H.V.D., Michel, F. (eds.) E4MAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3374, pp. 1–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Haselager, W.F.G.: Robotics, philosophy and the problems of autonomy. Pragmatics & Cognition 13(3), 515–532 (2005)Google Scholar
- 4.Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. The University College London Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
- 5.Castro Caldas, J., Coelho, H.: The Origin of Institutions: socio-economic processes, choice, norms and conventions. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2(2) (1999), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/2/2/1.html
- 6.Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Malsch, T., Weiß, G.: Conflicts in social theory and multiagent systems: on importing sociological insights into distributed AI. In: Tessier, C., Chaudron, L., Müller, H.-J. (eds.) Conflicting Agents. Conflict Management in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 111–149. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
- 11.Malsch, T., Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Socionics: Sociological Concepts for Social Systems of Artificial (and Human) Agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(1) (2007), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/1/11.html
- 12.Hahn, C., Fley, B., Florian, M., Spresny, D., Fischer, K.: Social Reputation: a Mechanism for Flexible Self-Regulation of Multiagent Systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(1) (2007)Google Scholar
- 17.Hodgson, G.M.: Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Polity Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
- 19.Lima, P.U., Custódio, L.M.: Multi-Robot Systems. In: Innovations in Robot Mobility and Control. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 8, pp. 1–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar