High Speed Train Noise Effects on Wildlife and Domestic Livestock

  • C. E. Hanson
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 99)


The planned introduction of high-speed trains in the US requires the assessment of potential corridors for such systems. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) recognized that noise and vibration issues are frequently among the potential impacts of most concern to residents. In contrast to some countries, city pairs are quite far apart in the United States, which brings the potential for high-speed train operations in rural and wilderness areas. Noise from high-speed train pass-bys in rural and wilderness areas may have effects on animals. Concerns have been raised by environmentalists who suggest high noise levels adjacent to a rail corridor can cause impact such as interference with communication, masking predation, startle and fright. FRA has adopted criteria for identifying the potential impact of such effects, based on research on aircraft over-flights with similar noise signatures. This paper summarizes the research, makes comparisons with high-speed train noise signatures and proposes criteria.


Noise Effect Wilderness Area Domestic Livestock Aircraft Noise Sonic Boom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Manci, K.M., Gladwin, K.N., Villella, R.: Effects of Aircraft Noise and Sonic Booms on Domestic Animals and Wildlife: A Literature Synthesis. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Ecology Research Center, Colorado, NERC-88/29 (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Effects of Noise on Wildlife and Other Animals, NTID300.5 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Effects of Noise on Wildlife and Other Animals: Review of Research Since 1971, Report No. 550/9-80-100 (1980)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larkin, R.P., Pater,L.L., Tazik, D.J.: Efffects of Military Noise on Wildlife: A Literature Review, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Technical Report 96/21 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roby, D.D., Murphy, S.M., Ritchie, R.J., Smith, M.D., Palmer, A.G.: Nordmeyer-Elmore, D., Pruitt, E., Krull, R.C.: The Effects of Noise on Birds of Prey: A Study of Peregrine Falcons in Alaska, U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, Report No. AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2002-0190 (July 2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley, F, Book, C., Bowles, A.E.: Effects of Low-altitude Aircraft Overflights on Domestic Turkey Poults, U.S. Air Force, Noise and Sonic Boom Impact Technology Program, Report No. HSD-TR-90-034 (June 1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaseloo, P.A., Tyson, K.O.: Synthesis of Noise Effects on Wildlife Populations, Office of Research and Technology Services, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. DTFH61-03-H-00123 (September 2004) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, High-Speed Ground Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Office of Railroad Development (October 2005),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Hanson
    • 1
  1. 1.Harris Miller Miller and Hanson Inc.BurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations