Person or Puppet? The Role of Stimulus Realism in Attributing Emotion to Static Body Postures
Knowledge of the relation between body posture and the perception of affect is limited. Existing studies of emotion attribution to static body postures vary in method, response modalities and nature of the stimulus. Integration of such results proves difficult, and it remains to be investigated how the relation can be researched best. In this study we focus on the role of stimulus realism. An experiment has been conducted where computer generated body postures in two realism conditions were shown to participants. Results indicate that higher realism not always results in increased agreement but clearly has an influence on the outcome for distinct emotions.
KeywordsNonverbal behavior emotion recognition body postures
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Cook, M.: Perceiving others: the psychology of interpersonal perception. Methuen, London (1979)Google Scholar
- 4.Ekman, P.: Basic emotions. In: Dalgleish, T., Power, M. (eds.) Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, John Wiley & Sons, Sussex (1999)Google Scholar
- 5.Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion: a reformulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 24(3), 711–724 (1967)Google Scholar
- 6.Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Ellsworth, P.: Emotions in the human face: guidelines for research and an integration of findings. Pergamon Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
- 7.Grammer, K., Fink, B., Oberzaucher, E., Atzmüller, M., Blantar, I., Mitteroecker, P.: The representation of self reported affect in body posture and body posture simulation. Collegium antropologicum 28(2), 159–173 (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
- 14.Schouwstra, S.J., Hoogstraten, J.: Head position and spinal position as determinants of perceived emotional state. Perceptual and Motor Skills 81(2), 673–674 (1995)Google Scholar
- 18.Winters, A.: Perceptions of body posture and emotion: A question of methodology. The New School Psychology Bulletin 3(2), 35–45 (2005)Google Scholar