Advertisement

Rational Agents That Blush

  • Paolo Turrini
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4738)

Abstract

A student, supported by his classmates, throws a piece of chalk at the teacher who is writing on the blackboard. The teacher rapidly turns back and promptly catches him in the act. The student blushes and suddenly realizes how bad it was what he did.

Keywords

Rational Agent High Self Esteem Belief Base Deontic Logic Social Emotion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science  (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive anatomy of shame and guilt: Differences, functions, defensive moves. EABCT, Manchester  (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelfranchi, C., Poggi, I.: Blushing as a discourse: Was darwin wrong? In: Shyness and Embarrassment: Perspectives from Social Psychology, pp. 230–251 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Responsibility for societies of agents. JASSS (2004), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/3.html
  5. 5.
    Damasio, A.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. NY G.P. Putnam’s Sons (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Sousa, R.: Emotion. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grossi, D., Royakkers, L.M.M., Dignum, F.: Organizational structure and responsibility. Forthcoming (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Higgins, E.T.: Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, 319–340 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oatley, K., Jenkins, J.M.: Understanding Emotions. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Festinger, L., Carlsmith, J.M.: Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58, 203–210 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marsella, S.C., Johnson, W.L., Labore, C.: Interactive pedagogical drama. In: Sierra, C., Gini, M., Rosenschein, J.S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 301–308. ACM Press, New York, USA (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ch Meyer, J.J.: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame J. of Formal Logic 29(1), 109–136 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ch Meyer, J.J.: Reasoning about emotional agents. In: Mántaras, R.L.d., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proc.16th European Conf. on Artif. Intell (ECAI 2004), pp. 129–133. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miceli, M.: How to make someone feel guilty: Strategies for guilt inducement and their goals. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22, 81–104 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miceli, M., Castelfranchi, C.: A cognitive approach to values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19, 169–194 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miceli, M., Castelfranchi, C.: How to silence one’s conscience: Cognitive defenses against the feeling of guilt. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28, 287–318 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miceli, M.: Personal communication (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The cognitive structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pitt, J.: Digital blush: towards shame and embarrassment in multi-agent information trading applications. Cognition, Technology and Work 6, 23–36 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Royakkers, L.M.M.: Extending deontic logic for the formalization of legal rules. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sloman, A.: Motives, mechanisms and emotions. In: Boden, M. (ed.) The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 231–247 (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Staller, A., Petta, P.: Introducing emotions into the computational study of social norms: A first evaluation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(1) (2001), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/1/2.html
  23. 23.
    van Benthem, J.: Where is logic going, and should it? In: Bencivenga, E. (ed.) What is to be Done in Philosophy? (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van der Hoek, W., van Linder, B., Meyer, J.-J.C.: A logic of capabilities. In: Matiyasevich, Y.V., Nerode, A. (eds.) LFCS 1994. LNCS, vol. 813, pp. 366–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van der Hoek, W., van Linder, B., Meyer, J.-J.C.: An integrated modal approach to rational agents. In: Proc. of PRR 1997, Practical Reasoning and Rationality (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Linder, B., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.J.C.: Actions that make you change your mind. Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, 103–146 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Turrini
    • 1
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
    • 2
  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
    • 3
  1. 1.University of SienaItaly
  2. 2.University of UtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.ISTC-CNRItaly

Personalised recommendations