Investigating Document Triage on Paper and Electronic Media

  • George Buchanan
  • Fernando Loizides
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4675)

Abstract

Document triage is the critical point in the information seeking process when the user first decides the relevance of a document to their information need. This complex process is not yet well understood, and subsequently we have undertaken a comparison of this task in both electronic and paper media. The results reveal that in each medium human judgement is influenced by different factors, and confirm some unproven hypotheses. How users claim they perform triage, and what they actually do, are often not the same.

Keywords

Digital Libraries Interaction Design Document Triage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Badi, R., Bae, S., Moore, J.M., Meintanis, K., Zacchi, A., Hsieh, H., Shipman, F., Marshall, C.C.: Recognizing user interest and document value from reading and organizing activities in document triage. In: Procs. IUI 2006, pp. 218–225. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bae, S., Badi, R., Meintanis, K., Moore, J.M., Zacchi, A., Hsieh, H., Marshall, C.C., Shipman, F.M.: Effects of display configurations on document triage. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 130–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cool, C., Belkin, N.J., Kantor, P.B.: Characteristics of text affecting relevance judgments. In: Procs. 14th National Online Meeting, Learned Society, pp. 77–84 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janes, J.W.: Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations. Information Processing & Management 27, 629–646 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, M., Buchanan, G., Mohd-Nasir, N.: An evaluation of webtwig - a site outliner for handheld web access. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, pp. 343–345. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, D., Belkin, N.J.: Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback. In: Procs. 24th ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 408–409. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Z.: Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation 60, 700–712 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall, C.C., Shipman, I.F.M.: Spatial hypertext and the practice of information triage. In: HYPERTEXT 1997. Proceedings of the eighth ACM conference on Hypertext, pp. 124–133. ACM Press, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mizzaro, S.: Relevance: The whole history. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 48(9), 810–832 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., Watkinson, A.: The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals. Inf. Process. Manage. 42(5), 1345–1365 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Hara, K., Sellen, A.: A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: CHI 1997. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 335–342. ACM Press, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saracevic, T.: Comparative effects of titles, abstracts and full text on relevance judgments. Journal of the American Society for Inf. Science 22, 126–139 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., Jose, J.M.: How users assess web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56(4), 327–344 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K.: TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wacholder, N., Liu, L., Liu, Y.-H.: Selecting books: a performance-based study. In: Procs. 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries, pp. 337–337. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J.B., Faulring, A., Pirolli, P.: A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for web search tasks. JASIST 53(2), 172–185 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Buchanan
    • 1
  • Fernando Loizides
    • 1
  1. 1.Future Interaction Technology Laboratory, University of Wales, Swansea 

Personalised recommendations