Building Maintainable Knowledge Bases with Knowledge Objects

  • John Debenham
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4692)

Abstract

Knowledge ‘objects’ are constructors for building chunks of knowledge that enable the hidden links in the knowledge to be identified. A single operation for objects enables these hidden links to be removed from the knowledge thus simplifying maintenance. Analysis of the maintenance links shows that they are of four different types. The density of the maintenance links is reduced by transforming that set into an equivalent set. In this way the knowledge base maintenance problem is analysed and simplified. A side benefit of knowledge items as a formalism is that they contain knowledge constraints that protect the knowledge from unforeseen modification.

Keywords

Knowledge-based systems maintenance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Debenham, J.: Why use a unified knowledge representation? In: Monostori, L., Váncza, J., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2070, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iglezakis, I., Reinartz, T., Roth-Berghofer, T.: Maintenance Memories: Beyond Concepts and Techniques for Case Base Maintenance. In: Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 227–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Debenham, J.: Fuzzy degrees of knowledge integrity. In: Proceedings 9’th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems IPMU-2002, pp. 1391–1398 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Debenham, J.: A rigorous approach to knowledge base maintenance. In: Proceedings Sixteenth International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE-2003, Loughborough, UK, pp. 219–228 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katsuno, K., Mendelzon, A.: On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In: KR’91. Proceedings Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barr, V.: Applying reliability engineering to expert systems. In: Proceedings 12’th International FLAIRS conference, pp. 494–498 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen-Burger, Y.-H.: Sharing and Checking Organisation Knowledge. In: Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jantke, K., Herrmann, J.: Lattices of knowledge in intelligent systems validation. In: Proceedings 12’th International FLAIRS conference, Florida, US, pp. 499–505 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Darwiche, A.: Compiling knowledge into decomposable negation normal form. In: Proceedings International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI’99, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 284–289 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Debenham, J.: Knowledge Engineering — Unifying Knowledge Base and Database Design. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, G., Santos, E.: Generalizing knowledge representation rules for acquiring and validating uncertain knowledge. In: Proceedings 13’th International FLAIRS conference, Florida, US, pp. 186–191 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramirez, J., de Antonio, A.: Semantic verification of rule-based systems with arithmetic constraints. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds.) DEXA 2000. LNCS, vol. 1873, pp. 437–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Debenham
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of IT, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway 2007Australia

Personalised recommendations