The Gap Between Small Group Theory and Group Support System Research

  • Joey F. George
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4715)

Abstract

Small group research and the development of small group theory have flourished in recent years, yet most group support systems (GSS) research is conducted without regard to theories of small groups. Here we contrast the richness of small group theory with the theoretical poverty of most experimental group support systems research. We look first at the state of small group theory, contrasting it with the state of theory in GSS work, using 10 recently published GSS studies as examples. Looking to small group theory as the basis for GSS research would add a great deal to GSS work, the topic of the next section in the paper. Absent a reliance on small group theory, however, we propose an alternative approach: Drop the GSS term altogether and return to a term that better describes what GSS research has always been about, supporting meetings, as captured in the phrase Electronic Meeting Systems.

Keywords

Group support systems small group theory electronic meeting systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ancona, D.G., Caldwell, D.F.: Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 634–665 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrams, D., Hogg, M.A., Hinkle, S., Otten, S.: The social identity perspective in small groups. In: Poole, M.S., Hollingshead, A.B. (eds.) Theories of Small Groups, pp. 99–137. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bacharach, S.B.: Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 496–515 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bales, B.F., Cohen, S.P.: SYMLOG: A System for Multiple Level Observation of Groups. Free Press, NYC (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs, R.O., Reinig, B.A., de Vreede, J.G.: Meeting Satisfaction for Technology-Supported Groups. Small Group Research 37(6), 585–611 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, A., Duck, J., Bordia, P.: Understanding the Multidimensionality of Group Development. Small Group Research 37(4), 327–350 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S.: Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science 36, 689–703 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Vogel, D.R.: Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings. MIS Quarterly 12(4), 591–624 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H.: Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of MIS 18(3), 235–257 (2001-2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeSanctis, G., Gallupe, R.B.: A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 33(5), 589–609 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121–147 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emerson, R.M.: Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27, 31–41 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: As assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of MIS 15(3), 7–149 (1998-1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frey, L., Sunwolf: The symbolic-interpretive perspective on group life. In: Poole, M.S., Hollingshead, A.B. (eds.) Theories of Small Groups, pp. 185–239. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Northcraft, G.B.: A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support. Information Systems Research 1(4), 394–415 (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    George, J.F., Jessup, L.M.: Groups Over Time: What Are We Really Studying? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47(3), 497–511 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gersick, C.J.: Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal 31(1), 9–41 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giddens, A.: The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. California Press, Berkeley, CA (1984)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gouran, D.S., Hirokawa, R.Y.: Functional theory and communication in decision making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In: Hirokawa, R.Y., Poole, M.S. (eds.) Communication & group decision making, 2nd edn., Sage Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heninger, W.G., Dennis, A.R., Hilman, K.M.: Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Information Systems Research 17(4), 415–424 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirokawa, R.Y., Poole, M.S. (eds.): Communication and group decision making, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang, W., Li, D.: Opening up the black box in GSS research: explaining group decision outcome with group process. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 58–78 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huber, G.: Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly 8(3), 195–204 (1984)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S. (eds.): Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. Macmillan Publishing Company, NYC (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., Contractor, N.: The network perspective on small groups: Theory and research. In: Poole, M.S., Hollingshead, A.B. (eds.) Theories of Small Groups, pp. 277–312. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein, E.E., Tellefsen, T., Herskovitz, P.J.: The use of group support systems in focus groups: Information technology meets qualitative research. Computers in Human Behavior (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kolfschoten, G.L., den Hengst-Bruggeling, M., de Vreede, J.G.: Issues in the Design of Facilitated Collaboration Processes. Group Decision and Negotiation (2006) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewin, K.: Field theory in social science. In: Cartwright, D. (ed.) Selected theoretical papers, Harper & Row, NYC (1951)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewis, L.F., Bajwa, D.S., Pervan, G., King, V.L.S., Munkvold, B.E.: A Cross-Regional Exploration of Barriers to the Adoption and Use of Electronic Meeting Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Limayem, M., Banerjee, P., Ma, L.: Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box. Decision Support Systems 42, 945–957 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGrath, J.E., Hollingshead, A.B.: Groups Interacting with Technology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (1994)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mejias, R.J.: The Interaction of Process Losses, Process Gains, and Meeting Satisfaction Within Technology-Supported Environments. Small Group Research 38(1), 156–194 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., George, J.F.: Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work: Theory and Practice at Arizona. Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Poole, M.S., Baldwin, C.L.: Developmental processes in group decision making. In: Hirokawa, R.Y., Poole, M.S. (eds.) Communication & group decision making, 2nd edn., pp. 215–241. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA (1996)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poole, M.S., Hollingshead, A.B.: Theories of Small Groups. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Putnam, L.L., Stohl, C.: Bona fide groups. In: Hirokawa, R.Y., Poole, M.S. (eds.) Communication & group decision making, 2nd edn., pp. 147–178. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1996)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rao, V.S., Jarvenpaa, S.L.: Computer support of groups: Theory-based models for GDSS research. Management Science 37(10), 1347–1362 (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., Savoie, A.: Teamwork Behaviors: A Review and an Integration of Frameworks. Small Group Research 37(5), 540–570 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sambamurthy, V., Poole, M.S.: The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research 3(3), 224–251 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schwarz, A., Schwarz, C.: The Role of Latent Beliefs and Group Cohesion in Predicting Group Decision Support Systems Success. Small Group Research 38(1), 195–229 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Skinner, Q. (ed.): The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steiner, I.D.: Group process and productivity. Academic Press, NYC (1972)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thibault, J.W., Kelly, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, NYC (1959)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tuckman, B., Jensen, M.: Stages of small group development. Group and Organizational Studies 2, 419–427 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vathanophas, V., Liang, S.Y.: Enhancing information sharing in group support systems (GSS). Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1675–1691 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joey F. George
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110USA

Personalised recommendations