Advertisement

Strategic Tabletop Negotiations

  • Tokuo Yamaguchi
  • Sriram Subramanian
  • Yoshifumi Kitamura
  • Fumio Kishino
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4663)

Abstract

Strategic negotiations in digital tabletop displays have not been well understood. There is little reported in the literature on how users strategize when group priorities and individual priorities conflict and need to be balanced for a successful collaboration. We conducted an observational study on three digital tabletop systems and a real-world setup to investigate similarities and differences in real-world and digital tabletop strategic collaborations. Our results show that in the real world, strategic negotiation involves three phases: identifying the right timing, using epistemic actions to consider a task plan and evaluating the value of the negotiation. We repeated the real-world experiments with different digital tabletops and found several differences in the way users initiate and perform strategic negotiations.

Keywords

Face-to-Face Collaboration Digital Tabletops Strategic Negotiations Collaborative Tables Single Display Groupware 

References

  1. 1.
    Bui, T.X., Shakun, M.F.: Introduction of the negotiation support system minitrack. In: Proceedings of HISS, Hawaii, 23 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elwart-Keys, M., Halonen, D., Horton, M., Kass, R., Scott, P.: User interface requirement for face to face groupware. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI, pp. 295–301. ACM Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietmeyer, B., Kaplan, R.: Strategic negotiation: A breakthrough four-step process for effective business negotiation. Kaplan Business (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz, P., Leigh, D.: DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM UIST, pp. 219–226. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirsh, D., Maglio, P.: On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science 18(4), 513–549 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitamura, Y., Osawa, W., Yamaguchi, T., Takemura, H., Kishino, F.: A display table for strategic collaboration preserving private and public information. In: Proceedings of IFIP ICEC 2005, pp. 167–179 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D., Greenberg, S.: Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: comprehension, coordination and communication. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13(5-6), 501–537 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsushita, M., Iida, M., Ohguro, T., Shirai, Y., Kakehi, Y., Naemura, T.: Lumisight table: A face-to-face collaboration support system that optimizes direction of projected information to each stakeholder. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW, pp. 274–283. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hines, J., Pangaro, G.: Sensetable: A wireless object tracking platform for tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI, pp. 253–260. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10(4), 281–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rekimoto, J., Saitoh, M.: Augmented Surfaces: A spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI, pp. 378–385. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Morris, M.R.: Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW, pp. 284–293. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott, S.D., Carpendale, S.T., Inkpen, K.M.: Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW, pp. 294–303. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott, S.D., Carpendale, S.T., Habelski, S.: Storage Bins: Mobile storage for collaborative tabletop displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25(4), 58–65 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., Mandryk, R.L.: System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In: Proceedings of ECSCW, pp. 159–178 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shen, C., Everitt, K., Ryall, K.: UbiTable: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 281–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Streitz, N., Geibler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Muller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., Steinmetz, R.: i-LAND: An interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI, pp. 120–127. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tandler, P., Prante, T., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Streitz, N., Steinmetz, R.: Connectables: Dynamic coupling of displays for the flexible creation of shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM UIST, pp. 11–20. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang, A., Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., Carpendale, S.T.: Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI, pp. 1181–1190. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tse, E., Histon, J., Scott, S.D., Greenberg, S.: Avoiding interference: How people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces. In: Proceedings of ACM CSCW, pp. 252–261. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tyler, T.R., Blader, S.L.: Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ullmer, B., Ishii, H.: The metaDESK: Models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM UIST, pp. 223–232. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu, M., Balakrishnan, R.: Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM UIST, pp. 193–202. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tokuo Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Sriram Subramanian
    • 2
  • Yoshifumi Kitamura
    • 1
  • Fumio Kishino
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Interface Engineering Laboratory, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871Japan
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5C9Canada

Personalised recommendations