Mutual Awareness in Collocated and Distant Collaborative Tasks Using Shared Interfaces

  • A. Pauchet
  • F. Coldefy
  • L. Lefebvre
  • S. Louis Dit Picard
  • A. Bouguet
  • L. Perron
  • J. Guerin
  • D. Corvaisier
  • M. Collobert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4662)

Abstract

Shared interface allowing several users in co-presence to interact simultaneously on digital data on a single display is an uprising challenge in Human Computer Interaction (HCI). Its development is motivated by the advent of large displays such as wall-screens and tabletops. It affords fluid and natural digital interaction without hindering human communication and collaboration. It enables mutual awareness, making participant conscious of each other activities.

In this paper, we are interested in Mixed Presence Groupware (MPG), when two or more remote shared interfaces are connected for a distant collaborative session. Our contribution strives to answer to the question: Can the actual technology provide sufficient presence feeling of the remote site to enable efficient collaboration between two distant groups?

We propose DigiTable, an experimental platform we hope lessen the gap between collocated and distant interaction. DigiTable is combining a multiuser tactile interactive tabletop, a video-communication system enabling eye-contact with real size distant user visualization and a spatialized sound system for speech transmission. A robust computer vision module for distant users’ gesture visualization completes the platform.

We discuss first experiments using DigiTable for a collaborative task (mosaic completion) in term of distant mutual awareness. Although DigiTable does not provide the same presence feeling in distant and or collocated situation, a first and important finding emerges: distance does not hinder efficient collaboration anymore.

References

  1. 1.
    Stefik, M., Bobrow, D., Foster, G., Lanning, S., Tatar, D.: Wysiwis revised: Early experiences with multi-user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(2), 147–167 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pederson, E., McCall, K., Moran, T., Halasz, F.: Tivoli: an electronic whiteborad for informal workgroup meeting. In: interCHI 1993, pp. 391–398 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang, A., Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S.: Videoarms: embodiments in mixed presence groupware. In: The BCS-HCI British HCI Group Conference (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraut, R., Fussel, S., Siegel, J.: Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. HCI journal 18, 13–49 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirk, D., Stanton, D., Rodden, T.: The effect of remote gesturing on distance instruction. In: CSCL 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buxton, W.: Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces. In: Graphics Interface 1992, pp. 123–129 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bier, E., Freeman, S.: Mmm: A user interface architecture for shared editors on a single screen. In: UIST 1991, pp. 79–86 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenberg, S., Boyle, M.: Moving between personal devices and public displays. In: Workshop on Handheld CSCW (November 1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart, J., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A.: Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In: CHI 1999, pp. 286–293 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hourcade, J.P., Bederson, B.B.: Architecture and implementation of a java package for multiple input devices (mid). Tech Report HCIL-99-08 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tse, E., Greenberg, S.: Sdgtoolkit: A toolkit for rapidly prototyping single display groupware. In: CSCW 2002 (November 2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pawar, U., Pal, J., Toyoma, K.: Multiple mice for computers in education in developing countries. In: ICTD (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Awareness in CSCW 11, 411–446 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang, A., Boyle, M., Greenberg, S.: Understanding and mitigating display and presence disparity in mixed presence groupware. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 37(2) (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers, Y., Lindley, S.E.: Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers 6, 1133–1152 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., Mandryk, R.L.: System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz, P.H., Leigh, D.: DiamondTouch: A Multi-User Touch Technology. In: UIST 2001, pp. 229–226 (November 2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rekimoto, J.: Smartskin: An infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bérard, F.: The Magic Table: Computer-Vision Based Augmentation of a Whiteboard for Creative Meetings. In: PROCAM 2003, Nice, France (June 2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, A.: Touchlight: an imaging touch screen and display for gesture based interaction. In: ICMI 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han, J.: Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In: UIST, pp. 115–118 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hollemans, G., Bergman, T., Buil, V., van Gelder, K., Groten, M., Hoonhout, J., Lashina, T., van Loenen, E., van de Wijdeven, S.: Entertaible: multi user multi-object concurent input. In: UIST 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Endsley, M.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1), 32–64 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segal, L.: Designing team workstations: The choreography of teamwork, in local applications. Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clark, H., Brennan, S.: Grounding in communication. In: Readings in Groupware and Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human- Human Collaboration (M.-K. Publishers, ed.), pp. 222–233 (1991)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S., Greenberg, S.: How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication. In: GROUP 2003, Sanibel Island, USA, pp. 369–378. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang, J.: Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(2), 143–160 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human-Computer Interaction (1993)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salvador, T., Scholtz, J., Larson, J.: The denver model for groupware design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin archive 28, 52–58 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Pauchet
    • 1
  • F. Coldefy
    • 1
  • L. Lefebvre
    • 1
  • S. Louis Dit Picard
    • 1
  • A. Bouguet
    • 1
  • L. Perron
    • 1
  • J. Guerin
    • 1
  • D. Corvaisier
    • 1
  • M. Collobert
    • 1
  1. 1.France Télécom R&D, 2 Av. Pierre Marzin, 22307 LannionFrance

Personalised recommendations