Bounded Session Types for Object Oriented Languages

  • Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini
  • Elena Giachino
  • Sophia Drossopoulou
  • Nobuko Yoshida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4709)


Earlier work explored the introduction of session types into object oriented languages. Following the session types literature, two parties would start communicating, provided the types attached to that communication, i.e. the corresponding session types, were dual of each other. Then, the type system was able to ensure soundness, in the sense that two communicating partners were guaranteed to receive/send sequences of values following the order specified by their session types.

In the current paper we improve upon our earlier work in two ways: we extend the type system to support bounded polymorphism, and we make the selection more object-oriented, so that control structures determine how to continue evaluation, depending on the class of the object being sent/received.

Interestingly, although our notion of selection is more powerful than that in earlier work, the ensuing system turned out not to be more complex, except for the notion of duality, which needed to be extended, to correctly deal with bounded polymorphism, and to capture the new notion of selection.

The paper contains an example, informal explanations, a formal description of the operational semantics and of type system, and a proof of subject reduction.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bonelli, E., Compagnoni, A., Gunter, E.: Correspondence Assertions for Process Synchronization in Concurrent Communications. Journal of Functional Programming 15(2), 219–248 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bracha, G., Odersky, M., Stoutamire, D., Wadler, P.: Making the Future Safe for the Past: Adding Genericity to the Java Programming Language. In: Chambers, C. (ed.) OOPSLA ’98, pp. 183–200. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruce, K.B., Schuett, A., van Gent, R., Fiech, A.: PolyTOIL: A Type-safe Polymorphic Object-oriented Language. ACM TOPLAS 25(2), 225–290 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canning, P., Cook, W., Hill, W., Olthoff, W., Mitchell, J.C.: F-bounded Polymorphism for Object-Oriented Programming. In: FPCA’89, pp. 273–280. ACM Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: A Calculus of Global Interaction Based on Session Types. In: DCM’06. ENTCS, Elsevier, Amsterdam (to appear, 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: Structured Communication-Centred Programming for Web Services. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP’07. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 2–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cardelli, L., Wegner, P.: On Understanding Types, Data Abstraction, and Polymorphism. Computing Surveys 17(4), 471–522 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castagna, G., De Nicola, R., Varacca, D.: Semantic Subtyping for the π-calculus. In: Panangaden, P. (ed.) LICS ’05, pp. 92–101. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castagna, G., Frisch, A.: A Gentle Introduction to Semantic Subtyping. In: Barahona, P., Felty, A. (eds.) PPDP’05, pp. 198–208. ACM Press, New York (2005) (joint ICALP-PPDP keynote talk)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coppo, M., Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Yoshida, N.: Asynchronous Session Types and Progress for Object-Oriented Languages. In: Bonsangue, M., Johnsen, E.B. (eds.) FMOODS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4468, pp. 1–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corin, R., Denielou, P.-M., Fournet, C., Bhargavan, K., Leifer, J.: Secure Implementations for Typed Session Abstractions. In: CFS’07, IEEE-CS Press, Los Alamitos (to appear, 2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Mostrous, D., Yoshida, N., Drossopoulou, S.: Session Types for Object-Oriented Languages. In: Thomas, D. (ed.) ECOOP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4067, pp. 328–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Yoshida, N., Ahern, A., Drossopoulou, S.: A Distributed Object Oriented Language with Session Types. In: De Nicola, R., Sangiorgi, D. (eds.) TGC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3705, pp. 299–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frisch, A., Castagna, G., Benzaken, V.: Semantic Subtyping. In: Plotkin, G. (ed.) LICS’02, pp. 137–146. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garralda, P., Compagnoni, A., Dezani-Ciancaglini, M.: BASS: Boxed Ambients with Safe Sessions. In: Maher, M. (ed.) PPDP’06, pp. 61–72. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gay, S., Hole, M.: Subtyping for Session Types in the Pi-Calculus. Acta Informatica 42(2/3), 191–225 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gay, S., Vasconcelos, V.T., Ravara, A.: Session Types for Inter-Process Communication. TR 2003–133, Department of Computing, University of Glasgow (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gay, S.J.: Bounded Polymorphism in Session Types. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science (to appear, 2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Honda, K.: Types for Dyadic Interaction. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 509–523. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Honda, K., Vasconcelos, V.T., Kubo, M.: Language Primitives and Type Disciplines for Structured Communication-based Programming. In: Hankin, C. (ed.) ESOP 1998 and ETAPS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1381, pp. 22–138. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Honda, K., Yoshida, N., Carbone, M.: Web Services, Mobile Processes and Types. EATCS Bulletin 2, 160–185 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Igarashi, A., Pierce, B.C., Wadler, P.: Featherweight Java: a Minimal Core Calculus for Java and GJ. ACM TOPLAS 23(3), 396–450 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, D.: A Calculus of Mobile Processes, Parts I and II. Information and Computation, 100(1) (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mostrous, D., Yoshida, N.: Two session typing systems for higher-order mobile processes. In: Ronchi Della Rocca, S. (ed.) TLCA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4583, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Odersky, M., Wadler, P.: Pizza into Java: Translating Theory into Practice. In: Felleisen, M. (ed.) POPL’97, pp. 146–159. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pierce, B.C.: Types and Programming Languages. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sparkes, S.: Conversation with Steve Ross-Talbot. ACM Queue 4(2), 14–23 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takeuchi, K., Honda, K., Kubo, M.: An Interaction-based Language and its Typing System. In: Halatsis, C., Philokyprou, G., Maritsas, D., Theodoridis, S. (eds.) PARLE 1994. LNCS, vol. 817, pp. 398–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vallecillo, A., Vasconcelos, V.T., Ravara, A.: Typing the Behavior of Objects and Components using Session Types. In: Brogi, A., Jacquet, J.-M. (eds.) FOCLASA’02. ENTCS, vol. 68(3), pp. 439–456. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vasconcelos, V.T., Gay, S., Ravara, A.: Typechecking a Multithreaded Functional Language with Session Types. Theorical Computer Science 368(1-2), 64–87 (2006)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walker, D.: Substructural Type Systems. In: Pierce, B.C. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Types and Programming Languages, pp. 3–44. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Web Services Choreography Working Group: Web Services Choreography Description Language,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini
    • 1
  • Elena Giachino
    • 1
  • Sophia Drossopoulou
    • 2
  • Nobuko Yoshida
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di Torino 
  2. 2.Department of ComputingImperial College London 

Personalised recommendations