Advances in Solid State Physics pp 289-300 | Cite as
Material Science with Positrons: From Doppler Spectroscopy to Failure Prediction
Abstract
We describe an alternative approach for a reliable lifetime prediction employing the local concentration of lattice defects as a precursor for fatigue failure. We present positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) as a non-destructive technique sensitive for defect concentrations in the range relevant to plasticity in metals.
The Bonn Positron Microprobe (BPM), a currently unique device, provides a fine focused positron beam with a selectable beam diameter from 5 to 200 µm assisted by an inbuilt fully functional scanning electron microscope (SEM). Using the BPM, plasticity and fatigue can be measured with a lateral resolution from some microns up to the range of millimeters.
Employing laterally resolved PAS and the empirical supposition of a linear relation between the defect concentration and the logarithm of the number of fatigue cycles, the point of failure was successfully predicted on the common carbon steel AISI 1045. For a generalization of the precursor method, a minimal model of fatigue based on a cellular automaton was developed. First results from a one-dimensional implementation are presented.
Keywords
Cellular Automaton Defect Density Fatigue Cycle Fatigue Failure Failure PredictionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]A. Wöhler: Zeitschrift f. Bauwesen 8, 642 (1858)Google Scholar
- [2]E. Gassner: Luftwissen 6, 61 (1939)Google Scholar
- [3]R. West: Adv. Phys. 22, 263 (1973)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [4]L. C. Smedskjaer, M. J. Fluss: Experimental Methods of Positron Annihilation for the Study of Defects in Metals, in: Methods of Experimental Physics Vol. 21, J. N. Mundy et al. (Eds.) (Academic Press, New York, London 1983)Google Scholar
- [5]P. J. Schultz, K. G. Lynn: Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 701 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [6]T. E. M. Staab, R. Krause-Rehberg, B. Kieback: J. Mater. Sci. 33, 3833 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]T. Wider, K. Maier, U. Holzwarth: Phys. Rev. B 60, 179 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [8]U. Holzwarth, P. Schaaff: Phys. Rev. B 69, 094110 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [9]I. Y. Dekhtyar, D. A. Levina, V. S. Mikhalenkov: Sov. Phys. Dokl. 9, 492 (1964)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [10]I. K. MacKenzie, T. L. Khoo, A. B. MacDonald, B. T. A. McKhee: Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 946(1967)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [11]I. Y. Dekhtyar, V. S. Mikhalenkov, S. G. Sakharova: Fiz. Tverd. Tela 11, 3322 (1969)Google Scholar
- [12]R. H. Ritchie: Phys. Rev. 114, 644 (1959)MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [13]A. Perkins, J. P. Carbotte: Phys. Rev. B 1, 101(1970)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]K. Jensen, A. Walker: J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 9757 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [15]A. F. Makhov: Sov. Phys. Solid State 2, 1934, 1942, 1945 (1961)Google Scholar
- [16]W. Brandt, R. Paulin: Phys. Rev. B 5, 2430 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [17]M. Puska, R. Nieminen: Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 841 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [18]E. Soininen, H. Houmo, P. A. Huttunen, J. Mäkinen, A. Vehanen, P. Hautojärvi: Phys. Rev. B 41, 6227 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [19]W. Frank, A. Seeger: Appl. Phys. 3, 61 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [20]B. Bergensen, T. McMullen: Solid State Commun. 24, 421 (1977)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [21]L. C. Smedskjaer, M. Manninen, M. J. Fluss: J. Phys. F 10, 2237 (1980)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [22]C. Hidalgo, S. Linderoth: J. Phys.: Metal Phys. 18, L263 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [23]K. Petersen, I. A. Repin, G. Trumpy: Condens. Matter. 8, 2815 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [24]G. Saada: Acta Metal. 9, 965 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]P. Hirsch, D. Warrington: Philos. Mag. 6, 735 (1961)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [26]I. K. MacKenzie, J. A. Eady, R. R. Gingerich: Phys. Lett. A 33, 279 (1970)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [27]C. Zamponi, S. Sonneberger, M. Haaks, I. Müller, T. Staab, G. Tempus, K. Maier: J. Mater. Sci. 39, 6951 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [28]U. Holzwarth, A. Barbieri, S. Hansen-Ilzhöfer, P. Schaaff, M. Haaks: Appl. Phys. A 73, 467 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]T. E. M. Staab, C. Zamponi, M. Haaks, I. Müller, S. Eichler, K. Maier: Mater. Sci. Forum, 445–446, 510 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]K. Bennewitz, M. Haaks, T. Staab, S. Eisenberg, Th. Lampe, K. Maier: Z. f. Metallkd. 93, 778 (2002)Google Scholar
- [31]B. S. Berry. Elastic and Anelastic Behavior, in: Metallic Glasses, J. J. Gilman, H. J. Leamy (Eds.) (American Society for Metals, Metals Park-Ohio 1978), pp. 161Google Scholar
- [32]M. Haaks, K. Maier: Predicting the Lifetime of Steels, in Extreme events in nature and society, S. Albeverio, V. Jentsch, H. Kantz (Eds.) (Springer, Berlin 2005), pp. 209Google Scholar
- [33]M. Haaks, I. Müller, A. Schöps, H. Franz: Phys. Stat. Sol. a 203, R31 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [34]H. Greif, M. Haaks, U. Holzwarth, U. Männig, M. Tongbhoyai, T. Wider, K. Maier, H. Bihr, B. Huber: Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2115 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [35]J. Dryzek, E. Dryzek: Tribol. Lett. 13, 309 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [36]P. Eich, M. Haaks, R. Sindelar, K. Maier: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Positron Annihilation, Hamilton 2006, Phys. Stat. Sol. c (in press, 2007)Google Scholar
- [37]A. Liu: Summary of Stress-Intensity Factors, in: ASM Handbook Vol. 19, N. D. DiMatteo, S. R. Lampman (Eds.) (1997) pp. 981Google Scholar
- [38]G. Sachs: Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 72, 734 (1928)Google Scholar