Advertisement

Subband-Adaptive and Spatially-Adaptive Wavelet Thresholding for Denoising and Feature Preservation of Texture Images

  • J. Li
  • S. S. Mohamed
  • M. M. A. Salama
  • G. H. Freeman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4633)

Abstract

In imaging applications such as ultrasound or Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), the local texture features are descriptive of the types of geological formation or biological tissue at that spatial location. Therefore, on denoising these texture images, it is essential that the local texture details characterizing the geological formation or tissue type are not lost. When processing these images, the operator usually has prior knowledge of the type of textures to expect in the image. In this work, this prior knowledge is exploited to implement a spatially-adaptive and subband-adaptive wavelet threshold that denoises texture images while preserving the characteristic features in the textures. The proposed algorithm involves three stages: texture characterization, texture region identification system training, and texture region identification and denoising. In the first stage, the texture features to be preserved are characterized by the subband energies of the wavelet decomposition details at each level. Next, the energies of the characteristic subband are used as inputs to train the adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) classifier for texture region identification. Finally, the texture regions are identified by the ANFIS and the subband-adaptive BayesShrink threshold is adjusted locally to obtain the proposed spatially-adaptive and subband-adaptive threshold.

Keywords

Mean Square Error Synthetic Aperture Radar Texture Image Wavelet Decomposition Texture Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Donoho, D.L.: De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 90(432), 1200–1224 (1995)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donoho, D.L, Johnstone, I.M.: Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425–455 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, S.G., Yu, B., Vetterli, M.: Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans. IP. 9(9), 1532–1546 (2000)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francos, J.M., Meiri, A.Z., Porat, B.: A unified texture model based on a 2-dWold-like decomposition. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 41, 2665–2678 (1993)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laine, Fan, J.: Texture classification by Wavelet packet signatures. IEEE Trans. Pattern Ana. Mach. Intel. 15(11), 1186–1191 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mallat, S.: A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-11, 674–693 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jang, J.: ANFIS. Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet 23, 665–685 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heiss, J.E., Held, C.M., Estevez, P.A., Perez, C.A., Holzmann, C.A., Perez, J.P.: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 21(5), 147–151 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Li
    • 1
  • S. S. Mohamed
    • 1
  • M. M. A. Salama
    • 1
  • G. H. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations