Limb Darkening: Getting Warmer

  • J. P. Aufdenberg
  • H.-G. Ludwig
  • P. Kervella
  • A. Mérand
  • S. T. Ridgway
  • V. Coudé du Foresto
  • T. A. ten Brummelaar
  • D. H. Berger
  • J. Sturmann
  • N. H. Turner
Part of the Eso Astrophysics Symposia book series (ESO)

Summary

We present interferometric observations and model atmosphere analyses of three stars: the F-type subgiant Procyon, the A-type supergiant Deneb, and the B-type supergiant Rigel. We use VLTI/VINCI and Mark III observations of Procyon to test recent multiwavelength limb-darkening predictions from 3-D hydrodynamic atmosphere simulations with no free parameters for convection. We also investigate the effects of different 1-D atmospheric convection treatments on limb-darkening predictions. We show that the 3-D model predictions are confirmed and we find that 1-D models fail to reproduce Procyon’s UV spectral energy distribution, a result consistent with models of granulation for Procyon’s surface. We use observations employing the longest baselines of the CHARA Array together with the FLUOR beam combiner to determine precise angular diameters for the two early-type supergiants and test limb-darkening predictions from expanding atmosphere models of these tars’ stellar winds. For Deneb, we derive angular diameters consistent with previous measurements, but which vary with position angle at the ≃3% level. Observations of the 2nd lobe of Deneb’s visibility curve are more consistent with expanding atmosphere predictions than hydrostatic atmosphere predictions. For Rigel, we derive from the CHARA/FLUOR observations a limb-darkened angular diameter consistent with a recent VLTI/IONIC measurement and 8% larger than reported from the Intensity Interferometer.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Mozurkewich et al. Angular Diameters of Stars from the Mark III Optical Interferometer. AJ, 126:2502–2520, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Kervella, F. Thé evenin, P. Morel, G. Berthomieu, P. Bordé, and J. Provost. The diameter and evolutionary state of Procyon A. Multi-technique modeling using asteroseismic and interferometric constraints. A&A, 413:251–256, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F.Abe et al.Probing the atmosphere of a solar-like star by galactic microlensing at high magnification. A&A, 411:L493–L496, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.M. Girardet al.A Redetermination of the Mass of Procyon. AJ, 119:2428–2436, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Allende Prieto, M. Asplund, R.J.G. López, and D.L. Lambert. Signatures of Convection in the Spectrum of Procyon: Fundamental Parameters and Iron Abundance. ApJ, 567:544–565, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.Schwarzschild. On the equilibrium of the sun’s atmosphere. In D.H. Menzel, editor, Selected Papers on the Transfer of Radiation. New York: Dover, 1966. Über das Gleichgewicht der Sonnenatmosphäre” Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Math.-phys. Kalsse (1906) 295, 41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A.J. Sauval, C. Allende Prieto, and D. Kiselman. Line formation in solar granulation. IV. [O I], O I and OH lines and the photospheric O abundance. A&A, 417:751–768, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.B. Hearnshaw. The Analysis of Starlight: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Astronomical Spectroscopy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.Müller. Die Photometrie der Gestirne. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1897.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.B. Hearnshaw. The Measurement of Starlight, Two Centuries of Astronomical Photometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.H. Payne. Stellar Atmospheres. Number1 in Harvard Observatory Monographs. Cambridge: Harvard Observatory, 1925.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.P. Aufdenberg, H.-G. Ludwig, and P. Kervella. On the Limb Darkening, Spectral Energy Distribution, and Temperature Structure fo Procyon. ApJ, 633, 424–439, 2005.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F.Castelli, R.G. Gratton, and R.L. Kurucz. Notes on the convection in the ATLAS9 model atmospheres. A&A, 318:841–869, 1997.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.Neckel and D.Labs. Solar limb darkening 1986-1990 (λλ 303 to 1099nm). Solar Physics, 153:91–114, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Asplund, Å.Nordlund, and R. Trampedach. Confrontation of Stellar Surface Convection Simulations with Stellar Spectroscopy. In ASP Conf. Ser. 173: Stellar Structure: Theory and Tests of Convective Energy Transport, page 221, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Shao, M.M. Colavita, B.E. Hines, D.H. Staelin, and D.J. Hutter. The Mark III stellar interferometer. A&A, 193:357–371, 1988.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.Kervellaet al.VINCI, the VLTI commissioning instrument: status after one year of operations at Paranal. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4838, pages 858–869, 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.H. Hauschildt, F.Allard, J. Ferguson, E. Baron, and D.R. Alexander. The NEXTGEN Model Atmosphere Grid. II. ApJ, 525:871, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Freytag, M. Steffen, and B. Dorch. Spots on the surface of Betelgeuse – Results from new 3D stellar convection models. AN, 323:213–219, 2002.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    U. Heiter et al.New grids of ATLAS9 atmospheres I: Influence of convection treatments on model structure and on observable quantities. A&A, 392:619–636, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.P. Aufdenberg et al.The Spectral Energy Distribution and Mass-loss Rate of the A-type Supergiant Deneb. ApJ, 570:344–368, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R.P. Kudritzki et al.The Wind Momentum-Luminosity Relationship of Galactic A- and B-Supergiants. A&A, 350:970, 1999.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.P. Aufdenberg et al. CHARA/FLUOR Observations of B- and A-type Supergiants Rigel and Deneb. in preparation.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T.A. ten Brummelaar et al.First Results from the CHARA Array. II. A Description of the Instrument. ApJ, 628:453, 2005.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. Coudé du Foresto et al.FLUOR fibered beam combiner at the CHARA array. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4838, pages 280–285, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S.R. Cranmer and S.P. Owocki. The effect of oblateness and gravity darkening on the radiation driving in winds from rapidly rotating B stars. ApJ, 440:308–321, 1995.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.HanburyBrown, J.Davis, and L.R. Allen. The angular diameters of 32 stars. MNRAS, 167:121, 1974.ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.B LeBouquin et al. First observations with an H-band integrated optics beam combiner at the VLTI. A&A, 424:719–726, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A.Richichi and I. Percheron. CHARM: A Catalog of High Angular Resolution Measurements. A&A, 386:492–503, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Richichi, I.Percheron, and M. Khristoforova. CHARM2: An updated Catalog of High Angular Resolution Measurements. A&A, 431:773–777, 2005.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Baschek, M. Scholz, and R. Wehrse. The parameters R and Teff in stellar models and observations. A&A, 246:374, 1991.ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Wittkowski, J.P. Aufdenberg, and P.Kervella. Tests of stellar model atmospheres by optical interferometry. VLTI/VINCI limb-darkening measurements of the M4 giant ψ Phe. A&A, 413:711–723, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Hanbury Brown, J. Davis, R.J.W. Lake, and R.J. Thompson. The Effects of Limb Darkening on Measurements of Angular Size with an Intensity Interferometer. MNRAS, 167:475, 1974.ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A.R. Hajian et al.Direct Confirmation of Stellar Limb Darkening with the Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer. ApJ, 496:484, 1998.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Quirrenbach et al.Angular Diameter and Limb Darkening of Arcturus. A&A, 312:160, 1996.ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D. Burns et al.The surface structure and limb-darkening profile of Betelgeuse. MNRAS, 290:L11, 1997.ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. Perrin et al.Interferometric observations of the supergiant stars α Orionis and α Herculis with FLUOR at IOTA. A&A, 418:675–685, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.Wittkowski et al.Direct Multi-Wavelength Limb-Darkening Measurements of Three Late-Type Giants with the Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer. A&A, 377:981, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    N. Ohishi, T.E. Nordgren, and D.J. Hutter. Asymmetric Surface Brightness Distribution of Altair Observed with the Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer. ApJ, 612:463–471, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Claret. A New Non-linear Limb-darkening Law for LTE Stellar Atmosphere Models. A&A, 363:1081–1190, 2000.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Aufdenberg
    • 1
  • H.-G. Ludwig
    • 2
  • P. Kervella
    • 3
  • A. Mérand
    • 3
  • S. T. Ridgway
    • 1
    • 3
  • V. Coudé du Foresto
    • 3
  • T. A. ten Brummelaar
    • 4
  • D. H. Berger
    • 4
  • J. Sturmann
    • 4
  • N. H. Turner
    • 4
  1. 1.National Optical Astronomy Observatory950 N. Cherry Ave TucsonUSA
  2. 2.Lund ObservatoryLund University22100 LundSweden
  3. 3.Observatorie de Paris-MeudonLESIA, UMR 810992195 Meudon CedexFrance
  4. 4.Mt. Wilson ObservatoryThe CHARA ArrayMt. Wilson, CA 91023USA
  5. 5.Georgia State University CHARAUSA

Personalised recommendations