Advertisement

Mixed-Initiative Relaxation of Constraints in Critiquing Dialogues

  • David McSherry
  • David W. Aha
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4626)

Abstract

Eliminating previously recommended items in a critiquing dialogue prevents the user from navigating back to acceptable items she critiqued earlier in the dialogue. An equally serious problem if previous recommendations are not eliminated is that acceptable items may be unreachable by any sequence of critiques. Progressive critiquing solves this dilemma while also making it easier for users to recognize when none of the available items are acceptable. In this paper, we present theoretical and empirical results that demonstrate the benefits of a critiquing strategy in which the user gives priority to constraints that must be satisfied in a progressive critiquing dialogue. We also present a new version of progressive critiquing in which mixed-initiative relaxation of constraints introduced by user critiquing choices that depart from this strategy greatly reduces their impact on dialogue outcomes.

Keywords

Critiquing recommender systems case-based reasoning constraint relaxation explanation mixed-initiative interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burke, R., Hammond, K.J., Young, B.: The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing. IEEE Expert 12, 32–40 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hammond, K.J., Burke, R., Schmitt, K.: A Case-Based Approach to Knowledge Navigation. In: Leake, D.B. (ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons & Future Directions. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 125–136 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linden, G., Hanks, S., Lesh, N.: Interactive Assessment of User Preference Models: The Automated Travel Assistant. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 67–78 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCarthy, K., Reilly, J., McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Experiments in Dynamic Critiquing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 175–182 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McSherry, D., Aha, D.W.: Avoiding Long and Fruitless Dialogues in Critiquing. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Tuson, A. (eds.) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIII. BCS Conference Series, pp. 173–186. Springer, London (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McSherry, D., Aha, D.W.: The Ins and Outs of Critiquing. In: Veloso, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 962–967 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reilly, J., McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Incremental Critiquing. Knowledge-Based Systems 18, 143–151 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McSherry, D.: Similarity and Compromise. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2689, pp. 291–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson, C.A., Göker, M.H., Langley, P.: A Personalized System for Conversational Recommendations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 393–428 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ricci, F., Arslan, B., Mirzadeh, N., Venturini, A.: ITR: A Case-Based Travel Advisory System. In: Craw, S., Preece, A.D. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, pp. 613–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McSherry, D.: Incremental Relaxation of Unsuccessful Queries. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 331–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Comparison-Based Recommendation. In: Craw, S., Preece, A.D. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, pp. 575–589. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aha, D.W., Breslow, L.A., Muñoz-Avila, H.: Conversational Case-Based Reasoning. Applied Intelligence 14, 9–32 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aha, D.W., McSherry, D., Yang, Q.: Advances in Conversational Case-Based Reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20, 247–254 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David McSherry
    • 1
  • David W. Aha
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computing and Information Engineering, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SANorthern Ireland
  2. 2.Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence, Naval Research Laboratory, Code 5514, Washington DC 20375USA

Personalised recommendations