The Functional Groups of Micro-organisms Used as Bio-indicator on Soil Disturbance Caused by Biotech Products such as Bacillus thuringiensis and Bt Transgenic Plants

  • Galdino Andrade

Insects are usually controlled with insecticides. Of the insecticides 5 % are biological, and more than 90 % of biological insecticides are based on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt; Sanchis 2000). The use of bio-insecticides has increased because of the growing need to obtain better quality food and to protect the environment, but very little is known about the impact these organisms have on the environment and mainly on the soil functional microorganism groups.

Due to the efficiency of bio-insecticides based on B. thuringiensis, the gene which produces the bio-insecticide crystal was introduced into plants to produce Bt-transgenic plants. Transformed tobacco using the Ti plasmodium from Agrobacterium tumefasciens was obtained in the 1980s. Later, the electroporation and bombardment or bio-ballistic of embryos method, which is more efficient for transformation of a greater number of plant species with the cry B. thuringiensis gene, was used (Peferoen 1997). The second generation of Bt-transgenic plants is presently obtained with the introduction of at least two cry genes in the plant genome, and there are already more than 20 species of transgenic plants of economic importance being used in a few countries (Sanchis 2000).

Although transgenic plants have been produced and sown for two decades, there is little information about their environmental impact. Currently proposed plant gene products will probably have less impact on soil ecosystems than some familiar and accepted practices. However, some transgenic plant products may have measurable adverse effects on soil organisms that will have to be monitored for some years after widespread introduction

Keywords

Transgenic Plant Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Bacillus Thuringiensis Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp Insecticidal Toxin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Selected Reading

  1. Addison JA (1993) Persistence and nontarget effects of Bacillus thuringiensis in soil: a review. Can J For Res 23:2329-2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amora-Lazcano E, Azcón R (1997) Response of sulphur cycling microorganisms to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of maize. Appl Soil Ecol 6:217-222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade G (1999) Interacciones microbianas en la rizosfera. In: Siqueira JO, Moreira FMS, Lopes AS, Guilherme LR, Faquin V, Furtinni AE, Carvalho JG (eds) Soil fertility, soil biology and plant nutrition interrelationships. Brazilian Soil Science Society/ Federal University of Lavras/Soil Science Department (SBCS/UFLA/DCS), Lavras, Brazil, pp 551-575Google Scholar
  4. Andrade G, Azcón R, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1995) Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture 1. An agrosystem affecting rhizobacterium modifies plant soil responses to a mycor-rhizal fungus. Appl Soil Ecol 2:195-202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrade G, Mihara KL, Linderman RG, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1997) Bacteria from rhizos-phere and hyphosphere soils of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 192;71-79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arencibia A, Vázquez RI, Prieto D, Téllez P, Carmona ER, Coego A, Hernández L, Selman-Housein G, De La Riva GA (1997) Transgenic sugarcane plants resistant to stem borer attack. Mol Breed 3:247-255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethlenfalvay GJ, Andrade G, Azcón-Aguilar C (1997) Mycorrhizae in sustainable agri-culture. 2. Plant and soil microorganisms in nodulated and nitrate fertilized peas. Biol Fertil Soils 24:164-168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cody RM (1989) Distribution of chitinase and chitibiose in Bacillus. Curr Microbiol 19:201-205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The rhizosphere. Advances series in agricultural sciences, vol 15, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 288Google Scholar
  10. Donegan KK, Seidler RJ, Fieland VJ, Schaller DL, Palm CJ, Ganio LM, Cardwell DM, Stein-bergers Y (1997) Decomposition of genetically engineered tobacco under field condi-tions: persistence of the proteinase inhibitor I product and effects on soil microbial respiration and protozoa, nematode and microarthropod populations. J Appl Ecol 34:767-777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot Juhnke M, Mathre DE, Sands DC (1987) Identification and characterization of rhi-zosphere-competent bacteria of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2793-2799Google Scholar
  12. Halverson LJ, Clayton MK, Handelsman J (1993) Population biology of Bacillus cereus UW85 in the rhizosphere of field-grown soybeans. Soil Biol Biochem 25:485-493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim DS, Cook RJ, Weller DM (1997) Bacillus sp. L324-92 for biological control of three root diseases of wheat grown with reduced tillage. Phytopathology 87:551-558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lereclus D, Agaisse H, Grandvalet C, Salamitou S, Gominet M (2000) Regulation of toxin and virulence gene transcription in Bacillus thuringiensis. Int J Med Microbiol 290:295-299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Linderman RG (1992) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil microbial interactions. In: Bethlenfalvay GJ, Linderman RG (eds) Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. ASA Special Publication, Madison, WI, pp 45-70Google Scholar
  16. Marschner P, Crowley DE (1996) Physiological activity of a bioluminescent Pseudomas fluorescens (strain 2-79) in the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal pep-per (Capsicum annum L. ). Soil Biol Biochem 18:191-196Google Scholar
  17. Martin PAW, Travers RS (1989) Worldwide abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2437-2442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazier M, Chaufaux J, Sanchis V, Lereclus D, Giband M, Tourneur J (1997) The cryIC gene from Bacillus thuringiensis provides protection against Spodoptera littoralis in young transgenic plants. Plant Sci 127:179-190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McBride KE, Svab Z, Schaaf D J (1995) Amplification of a chimeric gene in chloroplasts leads to an extraordinary level of an insecticidal protein in tobacco. Bio/technology. 13:362-365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meadows MP (1993) Bacillus thuringiensis in the environment: ecology and risk assess-ment. In: Entwistle PF, Cory JS, Bailey MJ, Higgs S (eds) Bacillus thuringiensis an environmental biopesticide: theory and practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 193-220Google Scholar
  21. Olsson S, Person P (1999) The composition of bacterial population in soil fractions dif-fering in their degree of adherence to barley roots. Appl Soil Ecol 12:205-215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Palm CJ, Donegan K, Harris D, Seidler RJ (1994) Quantification in soil of Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki d-endotoxin from transgenic plants. Mol Ecol 3:145-151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Palm CJ, Schaller DL, Donegan KK, Seidler RJ (1996) Persistence in soil of transgenic plant produced Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki d-endotoxin. Can J Microbiol 42:1258-1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulitz TC, Linderman RG (1989) Interactions between fluorescent pseudomonads and VA mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 113:37-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedersen JC, Damgaard PH, Eilenberg J, Hansen BM (1995) Dispersal of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in an experimental cabbage field. Can J Microbiol 41:118-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peferoen M (1997) Progress and prospects for field use of Bt genes in crops. Trends Biotechnol 15:173-177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petras SF, Casida Jr LE (1985) Survival of Bacillus thuringiensis spores in soil. Appl Env-iron Microbiol 50:1496-1501Google Scholar
  28. Pruett CJH, Burges HD, Wyborn CH (1980) Effect of exposure to soil on potency and spore viability of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Invert Pathol 35:168-174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reddy MS, Rhae JE (1989) Bacillus subtilis B-2 and selected onion rhizobacteria in onion seedling rhizospheres: effects on seedling growth and indigenous rhizosphere microflora. Soil Biol Biochem 21:379-383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanchis V (2000) Biotechnological improvement of Bacillus thuringiensis for agricul-tural control of insect pests: benefits and ecological implications. In: Charles JF, Delecluse A, Nielsen-Leroux C (eds) Entomophatogenic bacteria: from laboratory to field application. Kluwer Academic, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000) Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33:35-39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999) Transgenic plants; insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402:480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775-780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwab SM, Menge JA, Leonard RT (1983) Quantitative and qualitative effects of phos-phorus on extracts and exudates of sundangrass roots in relation to vesicular-arbus-cular mycorrhiza formation. Plant Physiol 73:761-765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Secilia J, Bagyaraj DJ (1987) Bacteria and actinomycetes associated with pot cultures of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Can J Microbiol 33:1067-1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sims SR, Holden LR (1996) Insect bioassay for determining soil degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki CryIA(b) protein in corn tissue. Environ Entomol 25: 659-664Google Scholar
  37. Sims SR, Ream JE (1997) Soil inactivation of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki CryIIA insecticidal protein within transgenic cotton tissue: laboratory microcosm and field studies. J Agric Food Chem 45:1502-1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singsit C, Adang MJ, Lynch RE, Anderson WF, Wang A, Cardineau G, Ozias-Akins P (1997) Expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cryIA(c) gene in transgenic peanut plants and its efficacy against lesser cornstalk borer. Transg Res 6:169-176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith RA, Couche GA (1991) The philloplane as a source of Bacillus thuringiensis vari-ants. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:311-331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1995a) Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1786-1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tapp H, Stotzky G (1995b) Dot blot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for monitor-ing the fate of insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:602-609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas DJI, Alun J, Morgan W, Whipps JM, Saunders JR (2000) Plasmid transfer between the Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis in laboratory culture and soil and in Lepidopteran and Coleopteran larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 118-124Google Scholar
  43. Tomlin AD (1994) Transgenic plant release: comments on the comparative effects of agriculture and foresty practices on soil fauna. Mol Biol 3:51-52Google Scholar
  44. Villas-Bôas LA, Villas-Bôas GFLT, Saridakis HO, Lemos MVF, Lereclus D, Arantes OMN (2000) Survival and conjugation of Bacillus thuringiensis in a soil microcosm. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:255-259Google Scholar
  45. West AW, Burges HD, Dixon TJ, Wyborn CH (1985) Survival of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus spore inocula in soil: effects of pH, moisture, nutrient availability and indigenous microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 17:657-665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young CS, Lethbridge G, Shaw LJ, Burns RG (1995) Survival of inoculated Bacillus cereus spores and vegetative cells in non-planted and rhizosphere soil. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1017-1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galdino Andrade
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of MicrobiologyState University of Londrina, CCBLondrina, PRBrazil

Personalised recommendations