Kinematic Compensation in Port-Hamiltonian Telemanipulation
A bilateral telemanipulator is a robotic system that allows the interaction with remote environments and it is composed by a controlled local robot (the master) and a controlled remote robot (the slave) interconnected through a communication channel. The motion imposed to the master by the human is transmitted to the slave which moves accordingly; when the slave interacts with a remote environment, the interaction force is fed back to the master side in order to improve the perception of the remote environment felt by the user. Passivity theory is a very suitable tool for the implementation of bilateral telemanipulation schemes over delayed communication channels. In passivity based telemanipulation, both master and slave are controlled by means of passive impedance controllers and master and slave sides are interconnected through a scattering based communication channel [1, 8] which allows an exchange of information which is passive independently of any constant communication delay. In this way, the overall telemanipulation system is passive and, consequently, its behavior is stable both in case of free motion and in case of interaction with any passive environment. In [12, 11], a generic framework for geometric telemanipulation of port-Hamiltonian systems  has been proposed; master and slave are interconnected through intrinsically passive port-Hamiltonian impedance controllers which allow to shape the energetic behavior of the robots and to achieve desired dynamic properties at master and slave sides. Local and remote sides are interconnected through a scattering based communication channel that allows a lossless exchange of energy.
KeywordsElastic Element Dirac Structure Interconnection Structure Remote Environment Slave Robot
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.P. Arcara and C. Melchiorri. Position drift compensation for a passivity-based telemanipulation control scheme. In Proceedings to Mechatronics Conference, Enschede, The Netherlands, June 2002.Google Scholar
- 3.N. Chopra, M.W. Spong, S. Hirche, and M. Buss. Bilateral teleoperation over the internet: the time varying delay problem. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, volume 1, Denver, Colorado, USA, June 2003.Google Scholar
- 4.D. Eberard, B. Maschke, and A.J. van der Schaft. Port contact systems for irreversible thermodynamical systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Seville, Spain, December 2005.Google Scholar
- 5.D. Eberard, B. Maschke, and A.J. van der Schaft. Energy conserving formulation of RLC-circuits with linear resistors. In Proceedings of the international symposium on mathematical theory of networks and systems, Kyoto, Japan, July 2006.Google Scholar
- 6.D. Lee and M.W. Spong. Passive bilateral control of teleoperators under constant time-delay. In Proceedings of IFAC world Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.Google Scholar
- 9.C. Secchi. Interactive Robotic Interfaces: a port-Hamiltonian Approach. PhD thesis, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 2004. available at http://www.dismi.unimore.it/download/thesis.pdf.
- 10.J.-J. Slotine and W. Li. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
- 12.S. Stramigioli, A. van der Schaft, B. Maschke, and C. Melchiorri. Geometric scattering in robotic telemanipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(4), 2002.Google Scholar
- 13.A.J. van der Schaft. L 2-Gain and Passivity Techniques in Nonlinear Control. Communication and Control Engineering. Springer Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
- 14.Y. Yokokohji, T. Tsujioka, and T. Yoshikawa. Bilateral control with time-varying delay including communication blackout. In Proceedings of the 10th Symposyum on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, 2002.Google Scholar