Advertisement

Direct calculation of the electrode movement Jacobian for 3D EIT

  • Camille Gómez-Laberge
  • Andy Adler
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 17)

Abstract

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) of media with deformable boundaries is very sensitive to electrode movement. This is especially important for EIT images of the thorax, which become distorted with breathing and posture change. Previously, we proposed a reconstruction method for imaging conductivity change and electrode movement based on an indirect pertturbation Jacobian calculation, involving the re-computation of the foward solution. Altough suitable for 2D and small 3D imaging,the reconstruction accuracy of this method gradually decreases, while the computation time grows rapidly for large 3D problems. We propose an efficient, novel method of calculating the Jacobian matrix directly from the Finite Element Method (FEM) system equations, without the re-calculation of the forward solution.

Keywords

Finite Element Method Electrical Impedance Tomography Finite Element Method Model Conductivity Distribution Admittance Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lozano A, Rosell J, Pállas-Areny R (1995) Errors in prolonged electrical impedance measurements due to electrode repositioning and postural changes. Physiol Meas 16:121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adler A, Guardo R, Berthiaume Y (1996) Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blott BH, Daniell GJ, Meeson S (1998) Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations. Phys Med Biol 43:1731–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lionheart WRB (1998) Boundary shape and electrical impedance tomography. Inv Prob 14:139–147.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolehmainen V, Lassas M, Ola P (2005) The inverse conductivity problem with an imperfectly known boundary. SIAM J Appl Math 66:365–383.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soleimani M, Gbmez-Laberge C, Adler A (2006) Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT. Physiol Meas 27:S1O3-S113.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polydorides N (2002) Image reconstruction algorithms for soft-field tomography. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Manchester Institute of Science ind Technology pp. 262.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graham BM, Adler A (2006) Electrode placement strategies for 3D EIT. 7th Conf Biomed EIT.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adler A, Lionheart WRB (2006) Uses and abuses of EIDORS: and extensible software base for EIT. Physiol Meas 27:S25-S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng KS, Isaacson D, Newell JC et al. (1989) Electrode models for electric current computed tomography. TEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adler A, Guardo R (1996) Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection. TEEE Trans Med Imag 15:170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsen PA, Gopinath AR (2004) Modeling inverse covariance matrices by basis expansion. TEEE Trans Speech Audio Processing 12:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golub GH, Loan CFV (1996) Matrix computations. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camille Gómez-Laberge
    • 1
  • Andy Adler
    • 1
  1. 1.Systems and Computer EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations