Advertisement

Electrodermal response – correlation between potential and conductance

  • A. Jabbari
  • Sverre Grimnes
  • Ørjan G. Martinsen
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 17)

Abstract

Electrodermal activity (EDA) is well known for sensing emotional activity and autonomous nerve activity. The changes are easily detected by means of electrical measurements, and since the sweat ducts are predominantly resistive, a low-frequency conductance measurement is appropriate for measurement of exogenous EDA. The endogenous measurements are carried out as dc potential measurements. The main purpose of this study was to compare the endogenous and exogenous responses in order to acquire a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Measurements of exogenous and endogenous EDR were conducted simultaneously in the palms of healthy volunteers, using the same electrodes for both measurements. The results suggest a high degree of correlation between skin impedance and skin potential, even if a bi-phasic skin potential response (SPR) wave occurred for some people. A possible interpretation of these results, is that the endogenous EDR activity is produced by streaming potentials in the sweat ducts. The exogenous pulse, on the other hand, will be due to the shunting effect of the filled sweat ducts, and the conductance will not completely return to baseline until these ducts are drained.

Keywords

Skin Conductance Response Skin Conductance Level Sympathetic Skin Response Skin Impedance Streaming Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shirai K, Yamamoto Y, Nakamura T, Kusuhara T (2006) Formative Mechanism of Skin Potential Activity and Relationships between Skin Potential and Skin Impedance. IFMBE Proc 14:2573-2576Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG (2000) Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grimnes S (1982) Psychogalvanic reflex and changes in electrical parameters of dry skin. Med Biol Eng Comput 20:734-740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asahina M (2003) Emotional sweating response in a patient with bilateral amygdale damage. Int J Psychophysiol 47:87-93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilcott RC (1958) Correlation of skin resistance and potential. J Comp Physiol Psychol 51:691-696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horn S, Hilz MJ(2000) Sympathetic skin response - technique of recording and aspects of clinical application. Nervenheilkunde 19:264-270Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malmivuo J (1995) Bioelectromagnetism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grimnes S, Martinsen ØG (2006) Bioimpedance. Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering (Akay M, ed.) John Wiley, Hoboken, 1:438-447Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S, Sveen O (1997) Dielectric properties of some keratinized tissues. Part 1: stratum corneum and nail in situ. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:172-176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S, Mûrkrid L, Hareide M (2001) Line patterns in the mosaic electrical properties of human skin - a cross correlation study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:731-734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ollmar S, Nicander I (1995) Information in multi-frequency measurement on intact skin. Innov Tech Biol Med 16:745-751Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinsen ØG, Grimnes S (1997) Dielectric properties of some keratinised tissues. Part 2: human hair. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:177-180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCleary, RA (1950) The nature of the galvanic skin response. Psychol Bull 47:97-117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grings, KW, Goadby HK (1936) Simultaneous photographic records of the potential and resistance effects of the psycho-emotive response. J Physiol 86:11Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chentsova-Dutton YE (2007) Gender differences in emotional response among European Americans and Hmong Americans. Cognition and emotion 21:162-181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latzman RD, Knutson JF, Fowles DC (2006) Schedule-induced electrodermal responding in children. Psychophysiol 43:623-632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Jabbari
    • 1
  • Sverre Grimnes
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ørjan G. Martinsen
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloBlindernNorway
  3. 3.Department of Clinical and Biomedical EngineeringRikshospitaletOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations