13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography pp 488-491 | Cite as
Projected Current from One Component of Magnetic Flux Density in MREIT
Abstract
Magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) provides a current density image by measuring the induced magnetic flux density within the subject using a magnet resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) is to visualize the current density and/or conductivity distribution in the subject using measured one component of the magnetic flux density B z of B. We consider a map T from current density vector field J to one component of magnetic flux density B z .The map T provides an orthogonal decomposition J=J P +J N of the current J where J N belongs to the null space of the map T. We explicitly describe the projected current density J P from measured B z . The projectedcurrent density J P providesa good approximation of the true current J in a real time. Numerical simulations show that J P from measured B z is quite similar to the target J. Biological tissue phantom experiments compare J P with the reconstructed J via the reconstructe disotropic conductivity using the harmonic B z algorithm.
Keywords
Null Space Current Density Distribution Conductivity Distribution Center Slice Conductivity ImagePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Birgul O, Hamamura M J, Muftuler L T, Nalcioglu O (2006) Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current. Phys Med Biol 51:5035–5050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Eyuboglu M, Reddy R, Leigh J S (1999) Tmaging electrical current density using nuclear magnetic resonance. Elektrik 6:201–214Google Scholar
- 3.Gamba H R, Bayford D, Holder D (1999) Measurement of electrical current density distribution in a simple head phantom with magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 44:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Gao N, Zhu S A, He B A (2006) New magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity. Phys Med Biol 51:3067–3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hamamura M J, Muftuler L TT, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O (2006) Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 51:2753–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ider Y Z, Birgul O (1998) Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for Electrical Impedance Tomography (MR-ETT). Elektrik 6:215–225Google Scholar
- 7.Joy M L G, Scott G C, Henkelman R M (1989) In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imag 7:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Joy M L (2004) MR current density and conductivity imaging: the statc of thc art, Proc. 26th Ann. Tnt. Conf. TEEE EMBS San Francisco CA USA, pp 5315–5319Google Scholar
- 9.Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y, Baek W S 2003 Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MRETT) using recessed electrodes. Phys Med Biol 48:1971–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Muftuler L, Hamamura M, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O (2004) Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 3: 599–609Google Scholar
- 11.Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K (2003) Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic B, algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 48:3101–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O, Seo J K (2005) Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MRETT. Physiol Meas 26:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Park C, Park E J, Woo E J, Kwon O, Seo J K (2004a) Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient B, algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 25:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Park C, Kwon O, Woo E J, Seo J K (2004b) Electrical conductivity imaging using gradient B, decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). LEEE Trans Med Tmag 23:388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L, Henkelman R M (1991) Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. TEEE Trans Med Tmag 10:362–374Google Scholar
- 16.Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L, Hankelman R M (1992) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging. J of Magn Reson 97:235–254Google Scholar