Projected Current from One Component of Magnetic Flux Density in MREIT

  • Oh In Kwon
  • Byung Il Lee
  • Chunjae Park
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 17)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) provides a current density image by measuring the induced magnetic flux density within the subject using a magnet resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) is to visualize the current density and/or conductivity distribution in the subject using measured one component of the magnetic flux density B z of B. We consider a map T from current density vector field J to one component of magnetic flux density B z .The map T provides an orthogonal decomposition J=J P +J N of the current J where J N belongs to the null space of the map T. We explicitly describe the projected current density J P from measured B z . The projectedcurrent density J P providesa good approximation of the true current J in a real time. Numerical simulations show that J P from measured B z is quite similar to the target J. Biological tissue phantom experiments compare J P with the reconstructed J via the reconstructe disotropic conductivity using the harmonic B z algorithm.

Keywords

Null Space Current Density Distribution Conductivity Distribution Center Slice Conductivity Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Birgul O, Hamamura M J, Muftuler L T, Nalcioglu O (2006) Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current. Phys Med Biol 51:5035–5050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eyuboglu M, Reddy R, Leigh J S (1999) Tmaging electrical current density using nuclear magnetic resonance. Elektrik 6:201–214Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gamba H R, Bayford D, Holder D (1999) Measurement of electrical current density distribution in a simple head phantom with magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 44:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao N, Zhu S A, He B A (2006) New magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity. Phys Med Biol 51:3067–3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamamura M J, Muftuler L TT, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O (2006) Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 51:2753–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ider Y Z, Birgul O (1998) Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for Electrical Impedance Tomography (MR-ETT). Elektrik 6:215–225Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joy M L G, Scott G C, Henkelman R M (1989) In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imag 7:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joy M L (2004) MR current density and conductivity imaging: the statc of thc art, Proc. 26th Ann. Tnt. Conf. TEEE EMBS San Francisco CA USA, pp 5315–5319Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K, Lee J Y, Baek W S 2003 Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MRETT) using recessed electrodes. Phys Med Biol 48:1971–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muftuler L, Hamamura M, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O (2004) Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 3: 599–609Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K (2003) Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic B, algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 48:3101–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O, Seo J K (2005) Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MRETT. Physiol Meas 26:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park C, Park E J, Woo E J, Kwon O, Seo J K (2004a) Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient B, algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 25:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park C, Kwon O, Woo E J, Seo J K (2004b) Electrical conductivity imaging using gradient B, decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). LEEE Trans Med Tmag 23:388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L, Henkelman R M (1991) Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. TEEE Trans Med Tmag 10:362–374Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L, Hankelman R M (1992) Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging. J of Magn Reson 97:235–254Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oh In Kwon
    • 1
  • Byung Il Lee
    • 2
  • Chunjae Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsKonkuk UniversitySeoulKorea, Democratic People's Republic of
  2. 2.College of Electronics and InformationKyung Hee UniversitySuwonKorea, Democratic People's Republic of

Personalised recommendations