Bayesian Network Decomposition for Modeling Breast Cancer Detection

  • Marina Velikova
  • Nivea de Carvalho Ferreira
  • Peter Lucas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4594)

Abstract

The automated differentiation between benign and malignant abnormalities is a difficult problem in the breast cancer domain. While previous studies consider a single Bayesian network approach, in this paper we propose a novel perspective based on Bayesian network decomposition. We consider three methods that allow for different (levels of) network topological or structural decomposition. Through examples, we demonstrate some advantages of Bayesian network decomposition for the problem at hand: (i) natural and more intuitive representation of breast abnormalities and their features (ii) compact representation and efficient manipulation of large conditional probability tables, and (iii) a possible improvement in the knowledge acquisition and representation processes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burnside, E.S., Rubin, D.L., Fine, J.P., Shachter, R.D., Sisney, G.A., Leung, W.K.: Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results. Journal of Radiology  (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahn, C.E., Roberts, L.M., Shaffer, K.A., Haddawy, P.: Construction of a bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Computers and Biology and Medicine 27(1), 19–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boutilier, C., Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M., Koller, D.: Context-specific independence in bayesian networks. In: Proc. of the 12th UAI Conference (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geiger, D., Heckerman, D.: Knowledge representation and inference in similarity networks and bayesian multinets. Artificial Intelligence 82, 45–74 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heckerman, D., Breese, J.S.: A new look at causal independence. In: Proc. of the 10th UAI Conference, pp. 286–292 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wellman, M.P., Breese, J.S., Goldman, R.P.: From knowledge bases to decision models. The Knowledge Engineering Review 7(1), 35–53 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    BI-RADS: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Velikova
    • 1
  • Nivea de Carvalho Ferreira
    • 2
  • Peter Lucas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA, NijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 ED NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations