Defending Against Jamming Attacks in Wireless Local Area Networks
Wireless local area networks(WLANs) work upon a shared medium and broadcast data frames via radio waves. These features let legitimate users connect to Internet conveniently at WLAN access points but also let a malicious attacker misuse network flexibly. Attackers can launch jamming attacks by exploiting vulnerabilities in 802.11, which is a dominant protocol used by WLAN. We discuss two jamming attacks, RTS and CTS jamming, and address their attacking conditions and threats. To defend against jamming attacks, a CUSUM based detection method is proposed, which can accurately detect jamming attacks with little computation and storage cost. When continuous attacking packets are sent out, a change-point will appear in a traffic sequence. Our detection method is capable to observe such change-points and then launch alarms. The efficiency of defense methods is verified by simulation results.
KeywordsAccess Point Hide Node Wireless Local Area Network Network Allocation Vector Hide Node Problem
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Bellardo, J., Savage, S.: 802.11 denial-of-service attacks: Real vulnerabilities and practical solutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, DC, pp. 15–28 (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Brodsky, B.: Nonparametric Methods in Change-Point Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (1993)Google Scholar
- 5.Gupta, V., Krishnamurthy, S., Faloutsos, M.: Denial of service attacks at the MAC layer in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of MILCOM 2002. vol. 2, pp. 1118–1123 (2002)Google Scholar
- 9.McCune, J.M., Shi, E., Perrig, A., Reiter, M.K.: Detection of denial-of-message attacks on sensor network broadcasts. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 64–78 (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Xu, W., Wood, T., Trappe, W., Zhang, Y.: Channel surfing and spatial retreats: defenses against wireless denial of service. In: Proceeding of 2004 ACM workshop on Wireless security, pp. 80–89 (2004)Google Scholar