Integrated Physically Based Manipulation and Decision-Making Tree for Navigation to Support Design Rationale

  • Ji-Hyun Lee
  • Tian-Chiu Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4557)

Abstract

We explore the idea of integrated physically based manipulation and decision-making tree for navigation to support design rationale. It introduces a way to support user participation. This paper also proposes and validates a framework which combines several techniques to aid user to make decisions. We hope this research can assist untrained users to quickly feel comfortable and satisfied for a computer aid system by rational way. This paper focuses on a system prototype for the client customization process in apartment plan design to exemplify our concepts.

Keywords

Rational Navigation Decision-making tree Fuzzy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll, J.M.: Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with computers 13(1), 43–60 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng, Y.-C.: Integrating scenario-based design and case-based design for user participation in Apartment plan design process, MS Thesis in Computational Design. National Yunlin University of Science & Technology: Douliu, Yunlin, Taiwan (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chien, S.-F.: Supporting information navigation in generative design systems, PhD Dissertation in Architecture. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herman, I., Melancon, G., Marshall, M.S.: Graph Visualization and Navigation in Information Visualization: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 6(1), 24–43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, X.-C., Peng, Q.-F.: Oh! Fuzzy. The 3rd wave, Taipei, Taiwan (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mickens, C.-D., Gordon, S.-E., Liu, L.: An introduction to Human Factors Engineering. Addision Wesley Longman, Reading, MA (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papaconstantinou, G.: Screen Space: Navigation and Interactivity. In: eCAADe conference, Greece, pp. 392–398 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parnas, D.L., Clements, P.C.: A rational design process:How and why to fake it. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(2), 251–257 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shneiderman, B.: Direct Manipulation for Comprehensible, Predictable and Controllable User Interfaces. In: 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interface, Orlando, USA, pp. 33–39 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Terry, J., Standing, C.: The Value of User Participation in E-Commerce Systems Development. Informing Science Journal 7, 31–45 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiao, L., Hao, X.: A Knowledge Base System in the Residential Intelligent CAD System. In: CAADRIA, Shanghai, China, pp. 161–170 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji-Hyun Lee
    • 1
  • Tian-Chiu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Computational Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Touliu, Yunlin 640Taiwan

Personalised recommendations