Guerilla Ergonomics: Perceiving the Affordances for Workplace Design

  • Lin Ye
  • Milena Petrovic
  • Marvin J. Dainoff
  • Leonard S. Mark
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4566)

Abstract

A successful ergonomic intervention involves creating affordances that support safe, effective, productive and comfortable working conditions. Guerilla ergonomics entails creating the requisite affordances using objects that are readily available in the workplace. This often means using objects in ways not intended in their original design. As such this has the advantage of creating viable working conditions quickly and cheaply. Workers learn how to adapt quickly to new problems or changes in the work environment. Our research has shown that the perception of the affordance for an object’s intended use can interfere with a person’s ability to see other uses for the object. Practice in perceiving new uses for objects as well as compiling a directory of possible solutions may help overcome these limitations.

Keywords

Affordance workplace ergonomics ergonomic intervention 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Merllie, M., Paoli, P.: Working Conditions in the European Union. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vink, P.: Comfort and Design: Principles and Good Practice. CRC Press, Newark (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dainoff, M.J.: Ergonomic comparison of VDT workstations. In: Sauter, S.L., Dainoff, M.J., Smith, M.J. (eds.) Promoting Health and Productivity in the Computerized Office, Taylor and Francis, London (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spilling, S., Eitrheim, J., Aaras, A.: Cost-benefit analysis of work environment investment at STK’s telephone plant in Kongsvinge. In: Corlett, N., Wilson, J., Manenica, I. (eds.) The Ergonomics of Working Postures, Taylor and Francis, London (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Westgaard, R.H., Aaras, A.: The effect of improved workplace design on the development of work-related musculoskeletal illnesses. Applied Ergonomics 16, 91–97 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, Mass (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torenvliet, G.: We Can’t Afford It! The Devaluation of a Usability Term. Interactions, pp. 12–17 (July 2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flach, J. M., Dominguez, C.: Use-centered design. Ergonomics in design (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crandall, B., Klein, G., Hoffman, R.R., Working Minds, A.: Practitioner’s Guide to Cognitive Task Asnslysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive work analysis. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dainoff, M. H., Dainoff, M. J.: Ergonomics and Guerilla Ergonomics. WordPerfect Magazine (May 1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maier, N.R.F.: An Aspect of Human reasoning. British Journal of Psychology 24, 114–155 (1933)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Defeytera, M.A., German, T.P.: Acquiring an Understanding of Design: Evidence from Children’s Insight Problem Solving. Cognition 89, 133–155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    German, T.P., Barrett, H.C.: Functional Fixedness in a Technologically Sparse Culture. Psychological Science 16, 1–5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, G.: The Power of Intuition. Doubleday, New York (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Ye
    • 1
  • Milena Petrovic
    • 1
  • Marvin J. Dainoff
    • 1
  • Leonard S. Mark
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Center for Ergonomic Research Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056USA

Personalised recommendations