Case Analysis of Criminal Behaviour

  • Tibor Bosse
  • Charlotte Gerritsen
  • Jan Treur
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4570)

Abstract

In this paper, it is shown how behavioural properties can be specified for three types of violent criminals. Moreover, it is shown how empirical material in the form of informal descriptions of traces of crime-related events can be formalised. Furthermore, it is shown how these formalised traces and behavioural properties can be used in automated analysis, for example in order to determine which type of criminal can have committed such a crime. Moreover, an underlying dynamical model is presented that shows causal mechanisms behind each of the behaviours, and their dependencies on the characteristics of the type of criminal and inputs in terms of stimuli from the environment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alison, L.J., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., Ormerod, D.: The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 8, 115–135 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Baal, P.H.M.: Computer Simulations of Criminal Deterrence: from Public Policy to Local Interaction to Individual Behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Boom Juridische Uitgevers (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron-Cohen, S.: Mindblindness. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartol, C.R.: Criminal Behavior: a Psychosocial Approach, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosse, T., Gerritsen, C., Treur, J.: Cognitive and Social Simulation of Criminal Behaviour: the Intermittent Explosive Disorder Case. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS’07. ACM Press (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., van der Meij, L., Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Specification and Verification of Dynamics in Cognitive Agent Models. In: Nishida, T., et al. (eds.) Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT’06, pp. 247–254. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., van der Meij, L., Treur, J.: LEADSTO: a Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by SimulaTiOn. In: Eymann, T., Klügl, F., Lamersdorf, W., Klusch, M., Huhns, M.N. (eds.) MATES 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3550, pp. 165–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brantingham, P.L., Brantingham, P.J.: Computer Simulation as a Tool for Environmental Criminologists. Security Journal 17(1), 21–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, L.E., Felson, M.: Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44, 588–608 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornish, D.B., Clarke, R.V.: The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delfos, M.F.: Children and Behavioural Problems: Anxiety, Aggression, Depression and ADHD; A Biopsychological Model with Guidelines for Diagnostics and Treatment. Harcourt book publishers, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Reactive Reasoning and Planning. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI’87. Menlo Park, California. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 677–682 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gottfredson, M., Hirschi, T.: A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Humphrey, N.: Consciousness Regained. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1984)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J., Wijngaards, W.C.A.: A Temporal Modelling Environment for Internally Grounded Beliefs, Desires and Intentions. Cognitive Systems Research Journal 4(3), 191–210 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, L., Wang, X., Eck, J., Liang, J.: Simulating Crime Events and Crime Patterns in RA/CA Model. In: Wang, F. (ed.) Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis, pp. 197–213. Singapore: Idea Group (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melo, A., Belchior, M., Furtado, V.: Analyzing Police Patrol Routes by Simulating the Physical Reorganisation of Agents. In: Sichman, J.S., Antunes, L. (eds.) MABS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3891, pp. 99–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moir, A., Jessel, D.: A Mind to Crime: the controversial link between the mind and criminal behaviour. Michael Joseph Ltd, Penguin, London (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raine, A.: The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal Behaviors as a Clinical Disorder. Guilford Publications, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modelling Rational Agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Towl, G.J., Crighton, D.A.: The Handbook of Psychology for Forensic Practitioners. Routledge, London, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turvey, B.: Criminal Profiling: an Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tibor Bosse
    • 1
  • Charlotte Gerritsen
    • 1
  • Jan Treur
    • 1
  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Artificial Intelligence, De Boelelaan 1081, NL-1081 HV, AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations