User Experience Modeling and Enhancement for Virtual Environments That Employ Wide-Field Displays

  • James J. W. Lin
  • Donald E. Parker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4561)


User experience in virtual environments including presence, enjoyment, and Simulator Sickness (SS) was modeled based on the effects of field-of-view (FOV), stereopsis, visual motion frequency, interactivity, and predictability of motion orientation. We developed an instrument to assess the user experience using multivariate statistics and Item Response Theory. Results indicated that (1) presence was increased with a large FOV, stereo display, visual motion in low frequency ranges (.03 Hz), and high levels of interactivity; (2) more SS was reported with increasing FOV, stereo display, .05-.08 Hz visual motion frequency, lack of interactivity and predictability to visual motion; (3) enjoyment was increased with visual motion in low frequency ranges (.03 Hz) and high levels of interactivity. The resulting response surface model visualizes the complex relationships between presence, enjoyment, and SS. Overall, increasing interactivity was found to be the most profound way to enhance user experience in virtual environments.


user experience modeling virtual environment presence simulator sickness enjoyment interactivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barfield, W., Sheridan, T., Zeltzer, D., Slater, M.: Presence and performance with in virtual environments. In: Barfield, W., Furness, T.A. (eds.) Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, pp. 473–513. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cobb, S.V.G., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., Wilson, J.R.: Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8, 169–186 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy, R.S., Stanney, K.M.: Aftereffects of virtual environment exposure: Psychometric issues. In: Smith, M., Salvendy, G., Koubek, R. (eds.) Design of computing systems: Social and ergonomic considerations, pp. 897–900. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reason, J.T., Brand, J.J.: Motion Sickness. Academic Press, London (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin, M.J.: Handbook of Human Vibration. Academic Press, London (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nichols, S., Haldane, C., Wilson, J.R.: Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52, 471–491 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nichols, S.: Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Methodological and theoretical issue. Doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plante, T.G., Aldridge, A., Bogden, R., Hanelin, C.: Might virtual reality promote the mood benefits of exercise. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 495–509 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, F.K., Sheldon, K.M., Turban, D.B.: Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 256–265 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N., Berbaum, K., Lilienthal, M.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 203–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, D.H.: Development of method for quantification and analysis of simulator sickness in a driving simulation environment. Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singer, M.J., Witmer, B.G.: Presence measures for virtual environments: Background & development. Draft ARI Research Note, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slater, M., Usoh, M., Steed, A.: Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 3, 130–144 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., Slater, M.: Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment 9, 497–503 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin, J.J.W., Duh, H.B.L., Parker, D.E., Abi-Rached, H., Furness, T.A.: Effects of Field of View on Presence, Enjoyment, Memory, and Simulator Sickness in a Virtual Environment. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, pp. 164–171 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, J.J.W.: Enhancement of User-Experiences in Virtual Environments that Employ Wide-Field Displays. Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, J.J.W., Razzaque, S., Parker, D.E.: Effects of Simulated Motion Frequency in Virtual Environments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (TIES 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, J.J.W., Parker, D.E., Lahav, M., Furness, T.A.: Unobtrusive Turns Prediction Cues Reduced Simulator Sickness during Passive Motion in a Driving Simulator. Ergonomics 48, 608–624 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin, J.J.W., Abi-Rached, H., Lahav, M.: Virtual Guiding Avatar: An Effective Procedure to Reduce Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI, 719–726 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. W. Lin
    • 1
  • Donald E. Parker
    • 2
  1. 1.Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJUSA
  2. 2.Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WAUSA

Personalised recommendations