Advertisement

How Should You Frame Questions to Measure User Attitudes Accurately? An Experimental Design Study

  • Seema Swamy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4560)

Abstract

Attitudes are most frequently measured through responses to questionnaires. The validity of the results is strongly dependent on the quality of the instrument. Questionnaires employed to evaluate users’ attitudes toward issues, products, or services frequently tend to have several biases yielding inflated responses. A 2 x 2 experimental design study established that rating attitudinal items on a Likert scale in a questionnaire with all statements framed in positive valence tend to produce higher attitudinal scores than when statements are balanced with both positive and negative valence.

Keywords

Attitude measurement validity reliability survey experimental design questionnaire and Likert scale 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allport, G.W.: Attitudes. In: Murchison, C. (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 798–884. Clark University Press, Worcester, MA (1935)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brace, I.: Questionnaire Design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page, London (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krosnick, J.A.: Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5, 213–236 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ray, J.J.: Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. The. Journal of Social Psychology 121, 81–96 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rorer, L.G.: The great response style myth. Psychological Bulletin 63, 129–156 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tesser, A., Whitaker, D., Martin, L., Ward, D.: Attitude heritability, attitude change and physiological responsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 24, 89–96 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seema Swamy
    • 1
  1. 1.10828 Alderbrook Lane, Cupertino, CA-95014 

Personalised recommendations