Usability Constructs: A Cross-Cultural Study of How Users and Developers Experience Their Use of Information Systems
Whereas research on usability predominantly employs universal definitions of the aspects that comprise usability, people experience their use of information systems through personal constructs. Based on 48 repertory-grid interviews, this study investigates how such personal constructs are affected by two factors crucial to the international development and uptake of information systems: cultural background (Chinese, Danish, or Indian) and stakeholder group (developer or user). We find that for the user group frustrating and useful systems are experienced similarly, whereas for the developers frustrating systems are experienced similarly to easy-to-use systems. Looking at the most characteristic construct for each participant we find that Chinese participants use constructs related to security, task types, training, and system issues, whereas Danish and to some extent Indian participants make more use of constructs traditionally associated with usability (e.g., easy-to-use, intuitive, and liked). Further analysis of the data is ongoing.
KeywordsCultural usability Usage experiences Repertory-grid technique
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Baber, C.: Repertory grid theory and its application to product evaluation. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 157–165. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
- 2.Barber, W., Badre, A.: Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Human Factors and the Web. AT&T Labs, Basking Ridge, NJ (1998), available at: http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/att4/proceedings/barber/index.html
- 3.Bell, R.C.: Using SPSS to Analyse Repertory Grid Data. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AU (1997), available at: http://eu.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/fransella/supp/gridspssman.doc
- 4.Evers, V., Day, D.: The role of culture in interface acceptance. In: Howard, S., Hammond, J., Lindgaard, G. (eds.) INTERACT 1997. Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 260–267. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Fransella, F., Bell, R., Bannister, D.: A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 7.Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2001)Google Scholar
- 12.ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO, Genève, CH (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1955)Google Scholar
- 16.Shackel, B.: The concept of usability. In: Bennett, J., Case, D., Sandelin, J., Smith, M. (eds.) Visual Display Terminals: Usability Issues and Health Concerns, pp. 45–87. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)Google Scholar