Agents in m-Learning Systems Based on Intelligent Tutoring

  • Vlado Glavinic
  • Marko Rosic
  • Marija Zelic
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4556)

Abstract

Intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) represent a particular kind of e-learning systems, which base their operation on the simulation of a human teacher in the learning and teaching process. With the advent of the mobile computing paradigm, m-learning systems, as the "portable and personal" fashion of e-learning, paved the way to the introduction of mobile intelligent tutoring. Mobile intelligent tutoring systems (MITSs) are targeted to fit into a mobile learner’s daily routine without disrupting her/his other activities, but conversely enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of learning in the context of handheld terminals of restricted capabilities. As in the non-portable ITS counterparts, MITSs’ tasks are taken over by agents, making them agent-based systems. In this paper we discuss the mobile intelligent tutoring paradigm, as well as the agent types to be used in the m-learning environment along with the presently affordable agent infrastructure enabling MITS implementation, and corroborate this with the description of a mobile intelligent tutoring model we are developing.

Keywords

agents intelligent tutoring systems m-learning agent-based systems mobile intelligent tutoring systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Society for Training and Development: A Vision of E-Learning for America’s Workforce. Report of the Commission on Technology and Adult Learning (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kinshuk: Adaptive mobile learning technologies GlobalEducator.com (2003)
  3. 3.
    Stankov, S.: Isomorphic Model of the System as the Basis of Teaching Control Principles in the Intelligent Tutoring System. PhD Dissertation. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture University of Split, Split (in Croatian) (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goh, T.T., Kinshuk: A discussion on mobile agent based mobile web-based ITS. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Computers in Education. Los Alamitos pp. 1514–1515 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui, Y., Bull, S.: Context and learner modeling for the mobile foreign language learner. System 33, 353–367 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Case, S., Azarmi, N., Thint, M., Ohtani, T.: Enhancing E-Communities with Agent-Based Systems. Computer, 64–69 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maes, P.: Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Comm. ACM 37, 30–40 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuflik, T., Shoval, P.: User profile generation for intelligent information agents. In: Proc. 2nd Int’l Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems. Stockholm, pp. 63–72 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel, A., Kinshuk, R.D., Oppermann, R.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Confluence of Information Science and Cognitive Science. In: Proc. Informing Science Conference. Krakow, pp. 392–397 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castro, E., Cuadra, D., Martinez, P., Iglesias, A.: Integrating Intelligent Methodological and Tutoring assistance in a CASE platform: The PANDORA experience. In: Proc. Informing Science & IT Education Conference. Cork (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ainsworth, S., Clarke, S.E., Gaizauskas, D.: Using edit distance algorithms to compare alternative approaches to ITS authoring. In: Cerri, A., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 873–882. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Major, N.: How Generic can Authoring Shells Become? In: Proc. AI-ED-95 Workshop on Authoring Shells for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Washington, pp. 75–82 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burns, H.L., Capps, C.G.: Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction. In: Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 1–18. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woolf, B.P.: AI in Education. In: Shapiro, I., Stuart, C. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence - Encyclopedias, pp. 434–444. John Willy & Sons Inc., New York (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    King, J.A.: Intelligent Agents: Bringing Good Things to Life. AI Expert, 17–19 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1987)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaques, P., Andrade, A., Jung, J., Bordini, R., Vicari, R.: Using pedagogical agents to support collaborative distance learning. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Boulder, pp. 546–547 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: JADE: a FIPA 2000, compliant agent development environment. In: Proc. 5th Int’l Conf. on Autonomous Agents. Montreal pp. 216–217 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poli, R.: Ontology for Knowledge Organization. In: Green, R. (eds.) Knowledge organization and change. Indeks, Frankfurt, pp. 313–319 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture. A Field Guide to Integrating XML and Web Services. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vlado Glavinic
    • 1
  • Marko Rosic
    • 2
  • Marija Zelic
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, HR-10000 ZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Kinesiology, University of Split, Teslina 12, HR-21000 SplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations