Web 2.0 Technology: Future Interfaces for Technology Enhanced Learning?

  • Martin Ebner
  • Andreas Holzinger
  • Hermann Maurer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4556)


Web 2.0 is an emerging catch phrase and the applications associated with it shocked the traditional eLearning world. However, is this really all new and can it be considered suitable for future interfaces for technology enhanced learning? In this paper, we present some experiences with LearnLand. This is an application designed and developed at Graz University of Technology and which has been running there since October 2006. It is based on the open-source software ELGG, which is a social software offering a high degree of choice, flexibility and openness and is considered as a system that places people at the hub of the activities. Our experimental research demonstrated that exactly thisease of use aspect is an absolute necessity for successful Web 2.0 learning applications. The tools of Web 2.0 have crossed Moore’s chasm and reached the early majority, where they are evolving rapidly. However, the idea of social software itself, especially in learning scenarios, is not as far developed as we may imagine. It is necessary to take into account the fact that too few innovators and early adopters are actually using Web 2.0 technology to enhance existing learning behaviors. Insufficient educational concepts with Web 2.0 technologies require much future work.


Technology Enhanced Learning Web 2.0 e-Learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Downes, S.: E-learning 2.0. ACM eLearn Magazine 10 (October 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Reilly, T.: Web 2.0: Stuck on a name or hooked on value? Dr. Dobbs Journal 31(7), 10–10 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richardson, W.: Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (CA) (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Intelligent social learning. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4(1), U61–U82 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Information Management: A Proposal (last access: 2007-01-31) (1989) http://www.w3.org/History/proposal.html
  6. 6.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziefle, M.: The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones. Behaviour & Information Technology 21(5), 303–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mifsud, L.: Alternative Learning Arenas - Pedagogical Challenges to Mobile Learning Technology. In: EducationIEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2002), pp. 112–117 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holzinger, A., Pichler, A., Maurer, H.: Multi Media e-Learning Software TRIANGLE Case-Study: Experimental Results and Lessons Learned. Journal of Universal Science and Technology of Learning 0(0), 61–92 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holzinger, A., Nischelwitzer, A., Meisenberger, M.: Mobile Phones as a Challenge for m-Learning: Examples for Mobile Interactive Learning Objects (MILOs). In: Tavangarian, D (ed.) 3rd IEEE PerCom, pp. 307–311 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holzinger, A., Nischelwitzer, A., Meisenberger, M.: Lifelong-Learning Support by M-learning: Example Scenarios. ACM eLearn Magazine, 5 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holzinger, A.: Multimedia Basics, Volume 2: Learning. Cognitive Fundamentals of multimedial Information Systems. Laxmi, New Delhi (2002) http://www.basiswissen-multimedia.at
  13. 13.
    Wittrock, M.C.: Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist 11, 87–95 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papert, S., Harel, I.: Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, Norwood (NJ) (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Holzinger, A.: Student-Centered Teaching Meets New Media: Concept and Case Study. IEEE Journal of Educational Technology & Society 5(4), 160–172 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collis, B.: New didactics for university instruction: why and how? Computers & Education 31, 373–393 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Egerman, K.: Effects of Team Arrangement on Team Performance - a Learning-Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3(5), 541 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neufeld, D.J., Haggerty, N.: Collaborative team learning in information systems: A pedagogy for developing team skills and high performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems 42(1), 37–43 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friesen, N., Anderson, T.: Interaction for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(6), 679–687 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sargeant, J., Curran, V., Allen, M., Jarvis-Selinger, S., Ho, K.: Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: Linking theory and practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26(2), 128–136 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore, G.E.: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2) (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bouhnik, D., Marcus, T.: Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(3), 299–305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kolbitsch, J., Maurer, H.: The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information. We Consume Journal of Universal Computer Science 12(2), 187–213 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holzinger, A.: Usability Engineering for Software Developers. Communications of the ACM 48(1), 71–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kolbitsch, J., Maurer, H.: Community Building around Encyclopaedic Knowledge. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 14(3), 175–190 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moore, G.A.: Crossing the Chasm, Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customer (revised edition). HarperCollins Publishers, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ebner, M., Scerbakov, N., Maurer, H.: New Features for eLearning in Higher Education for Civil Engineering. Journal of Universal Science and Technology of Learning 0(0), 93–106 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ebner
    • 1
  • Andreas Holzinger
    • 2
  • Hermann Maurer
    • 3
  1. 1.WG Social Learning, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 GrazAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics & Documentation (IMI), Research Unit HCI4MED, Medical University Graz, A-8036 GrazAustria
  3. 3.Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media (IICM), Graz University of Technology, A-8010 GrazAustria

Personalised recommendations